Horserace Articles

Democrats Rejected 11 Amendments Forcing Congress to Enroll in Obamacare

Wednesday, November 11th, 2009

CNSNews is reporting that the Democratic leadership rejected 11 amendments to the healthcare bills that would have required Congress to suffer under the same onerous healthcare legislation the they would force upon the rest of the country.

Republicans offered various schemes, some that would require only Congress to join Obamacare, some that would require even members of the Supreme Court, the president, the vice president and other federal employees to give up their generous Federal Employees Health Benefit Program.

“If Congress forces our constituents into a public option plan over time, then members of Congress should be expected to do the same,” Rep. Howard McKeon (R-Calif.) told CNSNews.com.

It is curious that Democrat members of Congress can sit there in Washington with a straight face and tell us lowly voters that Obamacare is best for us, yet steadfastly refuse to force themselves to exist under that same plan.

If Obamacare is so wonderful, why exactly are Democrat Congressmen so averse to suffering the same fate as the voters? It is obvious that they know the truth about Obamacare. It is a disaster and they know it. Otherwise, why would they fight so hard to stay out of it?

Tommy Thompson: The DNC Misrepresented Me

Friday, October 16th, 2009

Earlier this month, Tommy Thompson, former governor of Wisconsin and the Health and Human Services (HHS) secretary under President George W. Bush, along with former Democratic House Majority Leader Richard A. Gephardt, urged Congress to overcome their differences and get the job done on health care reform. And while Thompson admitted there still remained many “troublesome and unresolved” issues in the Baucuscare bill, the Democratic National Committee (DNC) wasted no time in exploiting this as the latest example in ‘bi-partisan support’ for the president’s health care reform legislation. An advertisement produced by the DNC asserts that Thompson along with fellow prominent Republicans like Senator Bob Dole, California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, Senator Susan Collins, and former Senator Bill Frist support the same health insurance reform proposal they do.

However, Tommy Thompson, appearing on Your World with Neil Cavuto on Fox News this afternoon, insists that what the DNC advertisement is perpetuating is simply not true. He argues that what he and fellow Republicans featured in the commercial signed onto was the notion that Republicans should work for reform, not, as Rahm Emanuel would care to suggest otherwise, that they should pass the reform plan created by the White House and the Congressional Democratic leadership. The advertisement, which has since been pulled from the airwaves, used Thompson’s image without his permission in order to attack Republicans. This was never his intention, the former Wisconsin governor said; his purpose was to bring the two sides together on the issue of health care reform for all Americans. He insists there is eighty percent of this current health care bill that both parties can support and that is what Democrats and Republicans in Congress should be focusing their efforts toward.

Robert Reich: What An Honest President Would Say About Health Reform

Thursday, October 15th, 2009

A little over two years ago, Robert Reich, former Labor Secretary under President Bill Clinton and currently an economic advisor to President Obama, spoke at the University of California, Berkeley. The content of what he said that evening has just now come to light. This is relevant not only because the content of his speech, or at least a portion of it, concerned health care reform, but that he let slip what the White House and the Congressional Democratic leadership truly have in store when it comes to this vital issue – none of it good.

Speaking at a Colloquium on Political Science at the California collegial institution on September 26th, 2007, Robert Reich spent time on a number of prominent topics, including, if you care to listen to the entire audio of the speech he gave that evening, global warming. But what concerns us most at the present time is what he had to say in regards to how healthcare reform should be presented by a candidate – presumably a progressive one – for president if, according to him, we as Americans truly lived in an educated, honorable, realistic democracy. Thank goodness we live in a constitutional republic, huh?

Reich spelled out for those in attendance what an honest president – so, in other words, neither his former boss nor his current one – should say to the American people about health care reform. Every single point he makes in the video above is in essence word-for-word the arguments conservatives have made for months in the course of this health care debate against the plans proposed by Congressional Democrats, including Senator Max Baucus’s joke of a bill, America’s Healthy Future Act of 2009.

Such gems include:

  • Young, healthy people having to pay more for health care
  • Keeping the latest medical technology and pharmaceutical drugs out of the hands of seniors because extending their lives a few more years is “too expensive”
  • And because seniors are ‘too expensive’ to maintain, the government is ‘just going to let them die’.
  • The government, using the leverage of Medicare and Medicaid programs, would force pharmaceutical companies to keep the costs of prescription drugs low. This, in turn, would mean ‘less innovation’ and ‘less new products’.
  • All this adds up to the conclusion that you will not likely live longer then your parents.

And, no, ladies and gentlemen, he isn’t joking.

It is very difficult to decide what is more astonishing – that someone like Robert Reich would go in front of an audience and openly say something like this or that the crowd actually applauds the fact that they will ‘not live longer’ then their parents. More then likely the room was packed full of white privileged elitists who are rich enough not to have to be subjected to the same medical care as the lowly mortals below them.

Snowe-melt predicted at top commerce perch

Tuesday, October 13th, 2009

Sen. Olympia Snowe may lose out on her shot at the top Republican seat on the Senate Commerce Committee if she votes for health care reform, committee members say.

The Hill is reporting that Republicans on the Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee are threatening to vote against Snowe’s bid for the seat, about to be vacated by Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison (Texas).

Democrats on the committee made the claims - allegedly telling a Hill reporter to “Wake up” when asked if Republicans would retaliate.

President Barack Obama has struggled to show any conservative support of his bill in the last week. Former Sen. Bob Dole even had his sound-byte removed from an ad the Administration was planning to show support.

A tally by The Washington Post found Snowe voted with the GOP 58.4 percent of the time on 308 votes this year, including on the $787 billion stimulus bill. Only her compatriot Maine Sen. Susan Collins (R) scored lower (58.1 percent).

MSNBC reports Snowe is the “cover the White House needs, NOT for bipartisanship, but for wooing Democrats like Ben Nelson and Tom Carper and Blanche Lincoln and Evan Bayh.”

They went on to point out that Baucus and the Democrats have given Snowe just about everything she asked for in wooing the centrist Republican from Maine.

George Stephanopoulos handicapped her vote here.

  • YES: 45% — “Voting yes keeps Snowe at the table and keeps Dems from moving immediately to reconciliation.”
  • NO: 40% — “Snowe is a Republican and she has to think about her base (Closed primaries in Maine).”
  • PASS: 15% — “The best way to keep your options open is to keep your options open.”

BREAKING: BAUCUS BILL UPDATES

Tuesday, October 13th, 2009

UPDATE 3:03 P.M. EASTERN- VOTE TALLIES:

Republican
CHUCK GRASSLEY -no
ORRIN G. HATCH -no
OLYMPIA J. SNOWE -yes
JON KYL -no
JIM BUNNING -no
MIKE CRAPO -no
PAT ROBERTS -no
JOHN ENSIGN -no
MIKE ENZI -no
JOHN CORNYN -no

Democrat
MAX BAUCUS -yes
JOHN D. ROCKEFELLER -yes
KENT CONRAD -yes
JEFF BINGAMAN -yes
JOHN F. KERRY -yes
BLANCHE L. LINCOLN -yes
RON WYDEN -yes
CHARLES E. SCHUMER -yes
DEBBIE STABENOW -yes
MARIA CANTWELL -yes
BILL NELSON -yes
ROBERT MENENDEZ -yes
THOMAS CARPER -yes

Agreed to (14-9)

The Mark is ordered reported.

UPDATE: 1:03 P.M. EASTERN- SEN. OLYMPIA SNOWE (R-ME) WILL VOTE “YES” ON BAUCUS BILL.

In what Sen. Max Baucus (D-MT), chairman of Senate Committee on Finance, calls an opportunity to “make history” by satisfying President Barack Obama’s top domestic priority, his bill will be up for vote around noon Tuesday to determine the future of the health care reform agenda of the White House and Congressional progressives.

Stay tuned to healthcarehorserace.com for the latest breaking news as the votes are tallied and the White House, Congress and the public respond.

AHIP: Reform will add $4,000 per year to health care premiums

Monday, October 12th, 2009

As the Senate Finance Committee prepares for a Tuesday vote on health care reform legislation, the private insurance trade group under the America’s Health Insurance Plans (AHIP) has gone on the offensive saying Max Baucus‘ America’s Healthy Future Act would actually escalate the already skyrocketing rise in health insurance premiums. In a report issued by PriceWaterHouseCoopers and commissioned by AHIP, researchers found that insurance premiums could go up by as much $4,000 per year (an 111-percent increase) if Congress adopts the plan now know as BaucusCare versus a 79-percent increase if no reforms are adopted.

Key Findings

Health reform could have a significant impact on the cost of private health insurance
coverage.

There are four provisions included in the Senate Finance Committee proposal that could
increase private health insurance premiums above the levels projected under current law:
o Insurance market reforms coupled with a weak coverage requirement,
o A new tax on high-cost health care plans,
o Cost-shifting as a result of cuts to Medicare, and
o New taxes on several health care sectors.

The overall impact of these provisions will be to increase the cost of private insurance
coverage for individuals, families, and businesses above what these costs would be in
the absence of reform.

On average, the cost of private health insurance coverage will increase:
o 26 percent between 2009 and 2013 under the current system and by 40 percent
during this same period if these four provisions are implemented.
o 50 percent between 2009 and 2016 under the current system and by 73 percent
during this same period if these four provisions are implemented.
o 79 percent between 2009 and 2019 under the current system and by 111 percent
during this same period if these four provisions are implemented.

(From PriceWaterHouseCoopers’  Potential Impact of Health Reform on the
Cost of Private Health Insurance Coverage
)

The timing of this new report couldn’t be worse for the White House and Congressional Democrats as three key members of the Finance Committee - Democrats Kent Conrad and Blanche Lincoln along with Republican Olympia Snowe , have yet to announce their intended votes on the bill but have all expressed concern over the potential costs to consumers if Americans are forced to purchase health insurance via an individual mandate which is included in not only the Baucus bill but all five of the bills currently being considered on Capitol Hill.

“This is a self-serving analysis from the insurance industry, one of the major opponents of health insurance reform,” White House spokesman Reid Cherlin said. “It comes on the eve of a vote that will reduce the industry’s profits. It is hard to take it seriously,” he added. (From Reuters’ White House blasts health insurance sector report.)

Democrats Jay Rockefeller and Ron Wyden have also expressed concern that the Finance bill’s lack of a government-run public option insurance plan will leave tens of millions of Americans without an affordable insurance option should Baucus’ cooperatives approach to reform be adopted in a final Senate bill and have refused to throw their support behind the bill ahead of the vote.

If the Finance Committee fails to pass a bill out of committee during tomorrow’s vote - or the vote is postponed due to a lack of support, health care reform could very well be off the table for 2009.

Poll: 47% Oppose Obamacare, 57% Oppose Dem Only Support

Friday, October 9th, 2009

A recent Quinnipiac poll has some bad news for Obama’s healthcare policy plans. At this point, the majority of Americans opposes his healthcare reform in the Quinnipiac University poll of October 8.

American voters oppose 47 - 40 percent President Barack Obama’s health care reform plan…

The poll also finds that Americans are not too happy to see any healthcare bills being pushed through without bipartisan support.

By a 57 - 37 percent margin, voters say Congress should not approve a health care overhaul with only Democratic votes.

But for opponents of the so-called public option, the poll found that it has support among those questioned.

61 - 34 percent for giving people the option of a government health insurance plan that competes with private plans…

Also, it appears that few Americans believe Obama’s promise that his healthcare plans will not add to the deficit.

On the negative side, voters don’t believe 71 - 19 percent that Obama can keep his promise that health insurance reform will not add to the federal deficit, down from 72 - 21 percent disbelief August 5. Even Democrats believe 50 - 32 percent that health insurance reform will add to the deficit.

The poll quizzed 2,630 voters.

Women, health care reform and 2010 …

Friday, October 9th, 2009

Soccer moms … Security moms … Health care moms?

If Democrats in Congress have their way, health care moms may be the buzz word of the 2010 midterm elections. As Democrats scramble to find a way to rationalize poll numbers that show Americans soundly rejecting the idea of government-run health care but split on reform in general, making reform a women’s issue could prove the solution to voting for an unpopular bill and retaining a Democrat majority in Congress in next year’s elections.

Nearly ninety-years after passage of the Nineteenth Amendment guaranteed women the right to vote, women have become a powerful voting bloc in American politics. President Obama’s landslide election in 2008 was in no small part due to his ability to carry 56-percent of the female vote (according to exit polls) in contrast to Republican John McCain’s 43-percent support from women voters. Presidents Bill Clinton and George W. Bush are said to owe their elections to soccer moms and security moms, respectively. So, could Democrats use health care moms to secure reform in 2009 and win re-election in 2010?

Yesterday, the women of the Democrat Party took to the floor of the United States Senate to make the case that a vote against health care reform is a vote against women. They related stories of women being unfairly treated by a health care system that seemingly discriminates against women’s health issues and called upon members of both parties to support American women by voting “yes” on health care reform. (Read the New York Times story “Democratic Women in Senate Speak on Behalf of Health Legislation“.)

Discriminatory practices in our health care system disproportionately affect women. And in all but 12 states, insurance companies are allowed to charge women more than they charge men for coverage. The great irony here is that mothers, the people who care for us when we’re sick, are penalized under our current system. (Democrat Senator Kay Hagan.)

In a now infamous exchange during the Senate Finance Committee debate on Max Baucus‘ America’s Healthy Future Act, Republican Jon Kyl incurred the wrath of Democrat Debbie Stabenow over whether including maternity care in health care reform would drive up the costs of insurance for men.

“I don’t need maternity care,” Mr. Kyl said. “And so requiring that to be in my insurance policy is something that I don’t need and will make the policy more expensive.”

Ms. Stabenow interjected: “I think your mom probably did.”

Three of the most significant votes in the Senate - moderate Republicans Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins and Democrat Blanche Lincoln, belong to women with Snowe and Lincoln reportedly undecided on how they will vote in next week’s Finance Committee showdown over health care reform.

Tying health care reform to women - and perhaps more importantly to their ability to care for their children, could be a winning strategy as Democrats try to unite their own party on health care reform and force the hands of Republican women who don’t want to look disconnected from the constituencies at a time when the nation is split on health care reform.

Rep. Grayson Tells GOP ‘Get Out of the Way’ on Health Care

Friday, October 9th, 2009

Once again, here is everyone’s favorite freshman Florida representative, Alan Grayson, Democrat from the 8th Congressional District, back to milk every last second of his fifteen minutes in the political spotlight for all it is worth. Notice how the man never once loses eye contact with the camera.

Politico has the video over at their website. There is no embedding, so just click the video below to go over to their site and watch the video:

gray-out

So what is he riling against this time? Is he claiming that a former Republican governor in his state likes to eat live puppies? Not exactly, but he did take aim at Republican legislators, specifically Maine Senator Olympia Snowe, telling them, in the area of health care, to “just get out of the way.” Yep, the ol’ spirit of bi-partisan cooperation and understanding, just like President Obama said he’d usher into Congress during his presidency. Rep. Grayson added, “You can lead, you can follow or you can get out of the way, and I’m telling you to get out of the way.”

Of course, as he has done twice in the past, Representative Alan Grayson did his little soapbox rant after business hours, once every Republican legislator had gone home for the evening. The man is absolutely spineless. The man has the gaul to mock Joe Wilson who stood up and said right to the President of the United States that he was a liar. Meanwhile this guy insists he is the only truth-teller in both houses of Congress, yet chooses to make such speeches to a chamber full of empty chairs.

Bozell: Reid Scheming to Ram ObamaCare Through Congress

Thursday, October 8th, 2009

In a conference call late Thursday afternoon, Brent Bozell, founder of the Media Research Center, reiterated what he said on Fox and Friends earlier in the day that Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid appears poised to sneak President Obama’s public-option health care reform proposal into an unrelated bill. Rather then hold a bi-partisan discussion in both the House and the Senate, Bozell says, “You’re going to get Harry Reid’s bill, passed by the Senate, by the Democrats… immediately rubber-stamping it, no debate, no House-Senate conference, no Republican discussion, and it goes right to the president for his signature, and oh, by the way, no one knows what’s in it.” Talk about a nuclear option.

A senior aide to the Nevada Democratic senator told CNSNews.com, a news site operated by MRC, that it is ‘likely’ the Senate Majority Leader will use House Resolution 1586 as a ‘shell’ for enacting the final version of the Senate’s health care legislation. H.R. 1586 was a bill passed this past March in the House that sought to impose a ninety percent tax on bonuses paid to employees of certain bailed-out financial institutions, specifically AIG. Were Senator Reid to do this, the substance of H.R. 1586 would be removed and replaced with whatever the White House and Congressional Democratic leaders ultimately decide will encompass their health care package. A scam such as this would require the support of sixty senators to vote for cloture on the motion to proceed to H.R. 1586, thus ending debate on the congressional procedure and moving the bill forward. If Reid successfully obtains the sixty votes needed, then debate begins on the health care package. However, Reid could choose to block all amendments and attempt to get a vote on the entire package.

Should the House vote on the bill as passed by the Senate without amending it, it could then be sent directly to President Obama’s desk for his signature (behind closed doors, no doubt, as was the case with the stimulus package) without the need for those pesky checks and balances. Here’s where it gets real scary: the actual text of the legislation will be determined by Reid himself, who at his own leisure can draft and insert textual language that was never approved by either the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee or the Senate Finance Committee.

This all seems a little much to wrap your brain around, right? Why would Senator Harry Reid, who trails in the polls in his own state behind Republican opponents, choose to do this? What politician in their right mind would sign on for this? Democratic candidates across the board are getting clobbered by their Republican opponents, so would this not make a catastrophic situation even worse? There is certainly enough corruption and lack of distain for the American populous to believe that the Democratic majority are capable of such a swindle, but why now? Does Harry Reid, with all his bent up ego, see himself as the modern day General Custer and this is his last stand? That if he is going to go down, he’s going to take every one else with him? From a political scientist stand point, this scenario does not make sense and, if it does come to pass, would only reek of desperation in the eyes of the American people, further damaging what little support the Democrats in Congress find themselves standing with now.