Articles Tagged ‘Nancy Pelosi’

Democrats Rejected 11 Amendments Forcing Congress to Enroll in Obamacare

Wednesday, November 11th, 2009

CNSNews is reporting that the Democratic leadership rejected 11 amendments to the healthcare bills that would have required Congress to suffer under the same onerous healthcare legislation the they would force upon the rest of the country.

Republicans offered various schemes, some that would require only Congress to join Obamacare, some that would require even members of the Supreme Court, the president, the vice president and other federal employees to give up their generous Federal Employees Health Benefit Program.

“If Congress forces our constituents into a public option plan over time, then members of Congress should be expected to do the same,” Rep. Howard McKeon (R-Calif.) told CNSNews.com.

It is curious that Democrat members of Congress can sit there in Washington with a straight face and tell us lowly voters that Obamacare is best for us, yet steadfastly refuse to force themselves to exist under that same plan.

If Obamacare is so wonderful, why exactly are Democrat Congressmen so averse to suffering the same fate as the voters? It is obvious that they know the truth about Obamacare. It is a disaster and they know it. Otherwise, why would they fight so hard to stay out of it?

Dems: Anti-Abortion Amendment to be Striped Out Later (Stupak Doesn’t Matter)

Monday, November 9th, 2009

At the last minute Representative Bart Stupak (D, Mich.) was successful in getting Speaker Pelosi and the House Democratic leadership to approve an amendment that would prohibit federal spending on abortion added to its nationalized healthcare bill passed and sent to the Senate over the weekend. But a senior Democrat says that the Stupak amendment will be stripped from the bill if the Senate returns the bill for approval.

Of course, the only reason that the House healthcare bill was passed out of the House at all was because of the Stupak Amendment, still left-wingers in Congress are vowing to strip the final bill of one of the only measures that appeals to moderates.

Far left Representative Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D, Fla.) has vowed that the anti-abortion amendment will be gone by the time the bill comes up for a final vote after the Senate debate. Pro-abortion activist and Democratic Congressman from Colorado Diana DeGette has been passing around a letter to her far left colleagues vowing not to vote for a future healthcare bill that does not include abortion funding. She has announced that 40 House Democrats have signed her pledge.

The truth is that the House bill has bare support and without the Stupak Amendment it couldn’t have passed.
(more…)

Some House Dems that Might Be Persuaded to Vote No on Obamacare

Friday, November 6th, 2009

Ken Marrero over at Blue Collar Muse reminds us that there are a few Democrats that could possibly be persuaded to vote against House Speaker Pelosi’s healthcare bill.

Word has it that Pelosi is going to try and strong-arm her bill to a floor vote this Saturday, so if you want to stop this bill, call the following Congressmen and voice your opinion.

  • Michael Arcuri (NY-24th)–(202) 225-3665
  • Steve Dreihous (OH 1st)–(202) 225-2216
  • Gabrielle Giffords (AZ-8th)–(202) 225-2542
  • Debbie Halverson (IL-11th)–(202) 225-3635
  • Steve Kagen (WI-8th)–(202) 225-5665
  • Betsy Markey (CO-4th)–(202) 225-4676
  • Tom Perriello (VA-5th)–(202) 225-4711
  • Loretta Sanchez (CA-47th)–(202) 225-5711
  • Vic Snyder (AR-29th)–(202) 225-2506
  • Zack Space (OH-18th)–(202) 225-2965

I should remind readers that if you call these on-the-fence Democrats it’s far more effective if you are from their District, though. Just random calls from across the country will mean far less than the calls of actual constituents.

Pelosi Breaks Pledge to Put Final Health Care Bill Online for 72 Hours Before Vote

Thursday, November 5th, 2009

(Reported by The Weekly Standard)

Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s office tells THE WEEKLY STANDARD that the speaker will not allow the final language of the health care to be posted online for 72 hours before bringing the bill to a vote on the House floor, despite her September 24 statement that she was “absolutely” committed to doing so.

House members are still negotiating important issues in the bill–whether it will provide taxpayer-funding for abortions, for example. Pelosi is pushing for a Saturday House vote, and a number of big changes will be introduced, likely less than 24 hours before the vote takes place (if in fact it does). The Rules Committee hasn’t yet released its resolution, or rule, that must be passed before the bill can move from committee to the floor. The rule will set the terms of debate and determine what amendments are in order.

It seems likely that the rule will allow very few, if any, up-or-down votes on amendments on the House floor. Rather, the rule will include a series of amendments that will all be adopted at once if the rule passes.

On September 24, Speaker Nancy Pelosi told THE WEEKLY STANDARD that she was “absolutely” committed to putting the text of the final House bill online for 72 hours before the House votes:

TWS: Madam Speaker, do you support the measure to put the final House bill online for 72 hours before it’s voted on at the very end?

PELOSI: Absolutely. Without question.

But tonight, when asked if Speaker Pelosi will leave the bill online for 72 hours after we see what’s in the rule, Pelosi spokesman Brendan Daly replied in an email: “No; [the] pledge was to have manager’s amendment online for 72 hours, and we will do that.”

Apparently Pelosi’s agreement to leave the “final” bill online “at the very end” of the process wasn’t such a straightforward pledge.

House to Vote This Weekend?

Thursday, November 5th, 2009

Apparently, Speaker Pelosi is getting a bit concerned that this healthcare fight is getting out of her control (do ya think?) and she wants to force a vote through this Saturday.

For his part, Rep. Mike Pence (R-Ind.) says, HR 3962 is a “freight train of runaway federal spending, bloated bureaucracy, mandates and higher taxes.”

Pence is correct that the iron boot of Obama’s government will come down on the necks of each and every citizen if these mandates and this government intervention comes to pass. Obamacare will make healthcare more expensive, harder to get, and of lesser quality. In truth, there is no other possible outcome as has been seen in every country that has tried it already.

Mike Pence on the House Version of Obamacare:

40 Democrats Lining Up to Oppose Pelosi’s Abortion Funding in Healthcare Bill

Monday, October 26th, 2009

The news is full of the behind closed doors deals being made by Democrat Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and House Speaker Pelosi but all is not harmonious in the land of healthcare “reform.”

One example of this is the fight amongst Democrats over abortion funding in Obamacare. Despite claims to the contrary, abortion will be funded by these various healthcare bills floating about in Congress. This fact makes moderate and conservative Democrats uneasy and forms just one of the many disagreements that Democrats are having with Democrats over Obamacare.

The Hill reports on this disagreement that has seen a group of up to 40 House Democrats banding together to oppose abortion funding in Obamacare.

These 40 Democrats, led by Rep. Bart Stupak (D-Mich.), are warning that they will try to block the healthcare bill if it still has abortion funding in it.

Stupak wants to force Pelosi to allow a vote on an amendment that would strip abortion funding from the House bill but is strongly opposed by Pelosi and powerful Democrats such as House Rules Committee chairwoman Louise Slaughter (D-N.Y.), who has apparently said there is “no way” she will allow a vote on Stupak’s amendment.

“There’s about 40 like-minded Democrats like myself — we’ll try to take down the rule,” Stupak said. “If all 40 of us vote in a bloc against the rule — because we think the Republicans will join us — we can defeat the rule. The magic number is 218. If we can have 218 votes against the rule, we win.”

According to The Hill, however, Stupak needs at least 41 Democrats to join his effort to affect the legislation. Still, it shows that the Democrats are not entirely united behind the far left-wing agenda of Obama, Reid, and Pelosi.

GOP AD: Democrats Healthcare Behind Closed Doors

Friday, October 23rd, 2009

In this video ad the Republican conference asks: what are the Democrats trying to hide and why is President Obama letting his claim to want transparency to go ignored?

House Speaker Lacks Democrat Votes for ‘Public Option’

Friday, October 23rd, 2009

Despite assurances to the contrary, Politico.com is reporting that Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D, Calif.) does not have the votes to include the so-called public option in the House version of Obamacare making it more likely that a “trigger” will be included instead.

Politico also reports that Obama himself announced support for the trigger option.

Obama told Senate Democratic leadership at the White House Thursday evening that his preference is for the trigger championed by Sen. Olympia Snowe (R-Maine) — a plan that would allow a public plan to kick in if private insurers don’t expand coverage fast enough, a top administration official told POLITICO. It’s also sign Obama is interested in maintaining a sense of bipartisanship around the health reform plan.

Regardless of the Politco report, however, Speaker Pelosi came out today in a press conference and insisted that the public option will, indeed, be in the bill.

Whatever the final outcome will be, however, this shows that Speaker Pelosi is having trouble manhandling her caucus. This also means that voters still have a chance to affect this vote by calling their representatives and urging them to oppose the public option.

Democrats Prepared to Cripple Private Insurance

Wednesday, October 14th, 2009

According to a report from Politico, Democrats have begun using the health care reform debate as a means to open fire on insurance companies, planning to remove a key provision that offers federal protection of their industry. Their efforts have been led by Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY) who “called for an amendment to the health care reform bill that would remove the long-standing antitrust exemption for insurers, echoing a push by other Democrats to crack down on the industry.”

“The health insurance’s antitrust exemption is one of the worst accidents of American history,” Schumer said. “It deserves a lot of the blame for the huge rise in premiums that has made health insurance so unaffordable. It is time to end this special status and bring true competition to the health insurance industry.”

Sen. Patrick Leahy, chairman of the Judiciary Committee, introduced a bill last month to remove the anti-trust exemption and convened a hearing Wednesday, where Schumer called for eliminating the exemption as part of the health bill working its way through Congress.

Schumer’s push comes on the heels of a controversial industry-sponsored report released over the weekend that makes the case that insurance premiums will go up by as much as $4,000 per family by 2019 if the Senate Finance Committee legislation is signed into law. The release of that report by the industry group America’s Health Insurance Plans sparked angry blowback from Democrats in both chambers.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) believes that this sort of punishment is “something that should have been done a long time ago.” 

“There isn’t anything we could do to satisfy them in this health care bill. Nothing,” Reid said. “They are so anti-competitive. Why? Because they make more money than any other business in America today. . . .What a sweet deal they have.”

Sen. Schumer is not alone in his fight to cripple the private insurance industry. According to the piece, top Democratic lawmakers in the House met in Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s office to discuss their maneuvering to garner support in their chamber of Congress to follow suit.

Insurance companies are not surprised at the move by Democrats in Congress to stifle their industry, recognizing that top Democratic lawmakers are forced to downplay recent discoveries of all the shortcomings in their push to overhaul the health care industry.

Health insurance officials dismissed the effort as a “political ploy.”

“Health insurance is one of the most regulated industries in America at both the federal and state level,” said Robert Zirkelbach, a spokesman for America’s Health Insurance Plans. “McCarran-Ferguson has nothing to do with competition in the health insurance market. The focus on this issue is a political ploy designed to distract attention away from the real issue of rising health care costs.”

Still, the push is likely to gather momentum as Democrats try to find a way to lash back at the insurance industry — whose report was viewed as a last-minute attempt to scuttle health care reform just days before Tuesday’s critical Senate Finance Committee vote. The legislation there was approved 14-9, with Republican Sen. Olympia Snowe of Maine voting yes and giving reform efforts a boost.

Leahy’s bill would repeal the exemption established in the 1945 McCarran-Ferguson Act for any companies engaged in price fixing or bid rigging — which are both already illegal. He has introduced similar legislation in other Congresses, including a broader repeal of the underlying law. Reid is a co-sponsor of the current bill.

In the House, where Democratic leaders are exploring the issue further, Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers (D-Mich.) has introduced legislation that would essentially end McCarran-Ferguson and give the federal government the right to regulate insurers at the national level.

 

Certainly, the attempt to further burden the insurance industry with excessive regulation will be fought by opponents of President Obama’s health care reform ambitions, and they will remind activists that any attempt to dismantle the private sector of medicine would inevitably decrease the quality of and access to health care for all Americans.

Reid: Finance Committee will vote on Baucus bill next Tuesday

Thursday, October 8th, 2009

A day after the Congressional Budget Office released its latest scoring of Finance chairman Max Baucus‘ effort at health care reform, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid announced that the Senate Finance Committee has scheduled a vote on the America’s Healthy Future Act when the Senate returns from Columbus Day weekend next Tuesday, October 13. While Democrats Kent Conrad and Blanche Lincoln have yet to announce whether they will vote in favor of the bill, the estimated price tag of  $829 billion is expected to be satisfactory to Democrats on the committee and put the bill in the hands of Reid in anticipation of a floor debate.

The Finance Committee bill is the only health care reform effort produced this year that has scored under President Obama’s declared veto threshold of $900 billion and is the only bill that does not include the politically charged government-run public option insurance plan. Both of those facts make it a favorite for approval by the United States Senate, but also set up a showdown between Senators and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi who earlier today promised that any bill passed by the House would include a public option.

Most pundits agree that a health care reform bill void of a public option will not garner the votes necessary to pass muster in the more liberal House Democrats. Yet, of the four public option driven bills currently being considered by Congress (three in the House alone), none have scored under $1 trillion dollars. Baucus’ cooperatives plan - which has drawn suspicion from conservatives for being a wolf in sheep’s clothing,  is therefore the best chance Democrats have of sending a reform bill to Obama’s desk in 2009 but is far from guaranteed to even make it out of the Senate.

Under the plan, 94 percent of Americans are expected to have health insurance by 2019 and revenues raised under the legislation - primarily through the introduction of new taxes, could actually reduce the budget by as much as $81 billion over the same time period.

  • According to CBO and JCT’s assessment, enacting the Chairman’s mark, as amended, would result in a net reduction in federal budget deficits of $81 billion over the 2010–2019 period.
  • By 2019, CBO and JCT estimate, the number of nonelderly people who are uninsured would be reduced by about 29 million, leaving about 25 million nonelderly residents uninsured (about one-third of whom would be unauthorized immigrants). (For the complete CBO analysis, click here.)

To the most liberal of Democrats, these cost savings come at the expense of approximately 16 million Americans (and another 8 million illegal immigrants) going without health insurance who they believe would be covered under a public option.To Republicans, the costs are too high to ensure too few and represent the single largest expansion of government entitlement programs in nearly four decades.

This is most likely why Reid has yet to back off of his threat to invoke the nuclear option of budget reconciliation should whip counts not provide the 60 votes he needs to get the bill through a full Senate floor debate. But, Reid has less than 48 hours after the Finance Committee votes to meet the October 15 deadline for invoking reconciliation. So, look for a Reid-authored Senate heath care reform bill to leak out well before the Finance Committee reconvenes next week.