Articles Tagged ‘Mainstream Media’

The People Have Questions!

Monday, September 28th, 2009

President Obama has insisted repeatedly that he wishes to hold a serious, good faith dialogue with the American people on health care reform in order to reach a bi-partisan consensus on the direction in which we as a nation need to take it. And yet, time and again, we have seen the White House and its mainstream media lapdogs attack anyone who dares raise a finger in opposition to the president’s proposal, dismissing them as brown shirts and racists. Many of the town hall events sponsored by Democratic legislators over the course of the August congressional recess felt like talking point recitals carefully orchestrated under the watchful eye of the Obama administration rather then constructive open dialogue sessions. Again, opponents who raised concerns about the direction the country was taking under Obama were shouted down, accused of being disruptive and violent.

This is precisely why the Common Sense Citizens Network (CSCN), a grassroots organization of concerned citizens created to fight against big government and rally support for fiscal sanity, personal responsibility, the rule of law, and national sovereignty, have decided to take the president up on his offer to hold an actual conversation with the American people on the state of health care in the United States. The CSCN is requesting the assistance of the American people to vote on their survey in order to select the top ten health care-related questions President Obama has yet to address during the course of this debate.

Some, though certainly far from all, of the questions offered in the survey include …

  • In earlier speeches, you promised the American people that they would be able to keep their health insurance under your plan. More recently, you have chenged the rhetoric to express only that nothing explicitly in the plan will force Americans to change their health insurance. Is it not true that, according to objective third-party analyses, millions of Americans would likely be forced to change their health insurance under your plan? Is there an objective third-party analysis showing that most Americans will continue to have the same options they have today? If so, which ones, and why are they more credible than the analyses coming to a contrary conclusion?
  • You have repeatedly accused the critics of your plan of engaging in ‘lies” and ’scare tactics.’ Do you believe that none of the criticisms of your plan are good faith criticisms? If any of the criticisms are good faith criticisms, which ones?
  • In your speeches, you have repeatedly emphasized that you that you are there to listen, that your door is always open and that you continue to seek common ground. Which ideas, if any, have you incorporated into your health care plan in order to find common ground with Blue Dog Democrats and/or Republicans?
  • If their payments fall and they make less money, won’t there be fewer doctors practicing medicine?
  • Will the law require Members of Congress and federal employees to be enrolled in the “government option/public plan,” and if not, why not?
  • HR3200 requires 500 billion in cuts in Medicare and Medicaid. How can these cuts be made without limiting access to healthcare or medicines recommended by my doctor?
  • How do you expect to meet the growing need for physicians and medical professionals if the government-run plan pays lower than market rates to physicians while forcing them to participate or lose a majority of their patients and their livelihood?
  • Proponents of a government-run option, you included, claim that it will compete on a level playing field with private insurance providers. In that case, will your government-run plan operate as a for-profit model and be forced to pay all applicable state, federal, and local taxes?

Also, if there is a question you would like to ask President Obama regarding health care reform is not in the survey, you may submit your question for inclusion on the list.

Obama to Pimp Public-Option on Letterman

Wednesday, September 16th, 2009

Late-night talk show host, David Letterman, is the latest addition to the roster of television/mainstream media personalities who will be granted the privilege of tossing talking point related soft-ball questions to President Barack Obama beginning this Sunday. The president’s appearance on CBS’s The Late Show with David Letterman, his fifth overall and his first since September 2008 in the midst of the presidential campaign, is part of the White House’s all-out media blitz, the first since his speech before the joint-session of Congress last Wednesday, in an effort to bolster fledgling support for his public-option health care proposal.

Suggesting David Letterman is a staunch supporter of the president and all the socialist-related causes he stands for would be to put it politely. To date since The One ascended into office in late-January, the CBS late-night personality has made little, if any, effort to criticize the president or his progressive agenda. He has, however, found ample opportunity to harass former-Alaska governor Sarah Palin and her family, including a quip poking ‘fun’ at her daughter being raped by a member of the New York Yankees.

In addition, you may remember Letterman’s obsessive compulsion concerning Senator John McCain in the remaining month of the 2008 presidential contest in relation to his cancellation of an appearance on his show, only to quickly appear with Katie Couric in an interview shortly thereafter. The issue of whether it was right for Senator McCain to ‘lie’ to Letterman about heading straight back to Washington D.C. is irrelevant. It purposely distracted from the fact that McCain did return to Capitol Hill, in spite of being in the midst of a highly contested presidential campaign, to help resolve the nation’s economic crisis. Barack Obama, on the other hand, had to be dragged kicking and screaming by President George W. Bush, after informing him, ‘call me if you need me.’ Goodness knows that Letterman vehemently refused to bring that point up because it would have reminded viewers Obama’s lack of concern for both his constituents and the nation as a whole. It would make him appear to be more desiring of the political title of commander-in-chief rather then helping the American people.

Rest assured, however, this is not about him!

President Obama will speak with David Letterman Monday evening following his tour of the Sunday-morning political talk shows on ABC, CBS, CNN, and NBC.

Air America Calls Obama ‘Fascist Liar’

Friday, August 21st, 2009

Does President Barack Obama have any friends left at all? It seems everyone is taking political pot shots at the guy. And it is not just conservatives and libertarians either. You have comedian Jon Stewart, a member of the mainstream media and an unapologetically staunch liberal, chastising the Obama administration for not pounding home the message of public-option while at the same praising the Bush presidency. Did we slip into some weird parallel dimension or something? Then there’s the far-left blogosphere that went totally unhinged when Kathleen Sebelius said the public option proposal was not ‘essential’ for the president’s health care reform bill, with some, especially at America Blog, calling for Howard Dean to replace Obama as the Democratic presidential candidate in 2012.

But now Air America Media, formerly Air America Radio, is attacking the president for his backroom deal with Billy Tauzin, President and CEO of PhRMA, an industry trade group representing the pharmaceutical research and biotechnology companies in the United States. The deal entails the drug industry agreeing to give Americans a future savings of $80 billion on the condition that President Obama agrees not to negotiate for lower drug prices. The kicker in this (outside the fact that he broke a prominent campaign promise to include the American people in any negotiates made with lobbyists and that there would no longer be any backroom deals in Washington under his reign) is that Obama’s own administration announced that over the next ten years Americans will spend roughly $3.6 trillion for prescription drugs. That $80 billion in future savings covers roughly two percent of that.

The audio showcased in the video below features guest radio host Christiane Brown talking with investigative reporter Greg Palast:

Want to know what the real scary part about this conversation is? Greg Palast poses the question of whether “the people out there screaming and breaking up the discussion at town meetings are correct.” Has the world gone mad? Next thing you know dogs and cats will be living together. Mass Hysteria!

Have Blue Dog Democrats Sold Out on Health Care?

Wednesday, July 29th, 2009

It never ceases to amaze those in the realm of political discourse how things can change so quickly in so little time. Less than a day after a memo from David L. Cavicke, Republican Chief of Staff for the Committee on Energy and Commerce, was leaked and obtained by Politico in which it was revealed that “Democratic Leadership” had “told Mr. Boehner’s staff that there will be no vote on Health on the Floor before recess and we will leave Friday,” an apparent breakthrough has been made on the Blue Dog Democrat front of the health care reform battle. What this last-minute deal means – a victory for ObamaCare and the Democratic leadership or simple a face-saving rouse – has yet to be seen.

Fox News is reporting that a deal was reached early this morning. The compromise, according to one member of the fiscally conservative Blue Dog Coalition, “would cut the cost of the $1 trillion-plus package by $100 billion” and would “ensure that the proposed government-run insurance program would not be forced on anyone.” In exchange, the floor vote in the House will be put off until after Labor Day when legislators reconvene. Seven Blue Dog Democrats held up passage of the bill within the Committee on Energy and Commerce, the only panel within the House not to pass some form of the president’s health care reform legislation, over growing concerns for the high-cost of the program and the speed at which Democratic leadership was trying to force a vote. Four of those seven Blue Dogs on the committee – Representatives Mike Ross of Arkansas, Baron Hill of Indiana, Zack Space of Ohio, and Bart Gordon of Tennessee – relented and agreed on passage of the bill this morning. This gives Chairman Henry Waxman, representative from California, just enough votes to pass the bill through the committee. It is expected that the committee will meet up this afternoon for mark-up, or finalization, of the bill.

What will happen to President Obama’s health care reform legislation hereafter is anyone’s guess at this point. This is hardly a victory for the White House and the Democratic leadership in Congress, however. There is no physical bill for the president to sign – undoubtedly though he will go out among the masses at his town-hall revivals and proclaim, quite prematurely, “Mission: Accomplished” on ‘meeting’ his August deadline – and there will not be a floor vote on the bill until after Labor Day. At most this ‘deal’ was simply a face-saving maneuver for Obama and Nancy Pelosi going into recess. Still, the choice for the Democrats to take the fight over health care reform in this direction is a double-edged sword for them. Going into recess with nothing would have been hugely embarrassing for the Democrats. Congressional Republicans would have touted this as a victory for their cause and rightfully so. At least with this, they can proclaim that they accomplished something, even if what they eventually did produce lacked any real teeth. No doubt their friends in the mainstream media will gleefully help mask this rouse as a victory for the White House.

But, at the same time, opponents of the president’s legislation have gained a vital opportunity as well. They now have a fixed target date and, quite possibly by the time both houses of Congress break for recess, will have actual legislation to cite. This basically allots them weeks of free-range target practice in which to take pot shots at moderate ‘Blue Dog’ Democrats for not reading the bill. They’ll have plenty of ammo to use. For example, the fact that the $100 billion ‘cut’ from the program is a mere spit in the bucket compared to the overall $900 billion cost.

One has to also take note that while this not be a solid victory for the Democrats, neither is it defeat. The fight is just beginning. Nancy Pelosi still only needs thirteen or fourteen of the fifty-two Blue Dog Democrats to pass the bill on the floor on a razor-thin majority vote.

Media Turns Blind Eye to Healthcare Debate Leader

Tuesday, July 28th, 2009

The ongoing healthcare reform debate has brought many different views and opinions to the public eye on how to fix the United State’s healthcare system. Seemingly everyone with an idea or an opinion about how to radically change the healthcare system, or every person with a sob story about how they were screwed over by the medical industry has been given a soap box by the mainstream media.

However yet again it seems that the mainstream has the penchant to ignore facts and events that do not mesh with their own beliefs or their agenda. The National Center for Policy Analysis or NCPA is one of the groups that helped defeat Hillary Care back in the 1990s. As they did in the 1990s they are just as active today in opposing government run socialized healthcare. However, the Mainstream media has widely ignored what the National Center for Policy Analysis is doing and the success that they have had so far. As of today, over 831,343 people have signed the National Center for Policy Analysis petition against government run healthcare. 12,351 people have joined the NCPA Free Our Healthcare cause on the popular Facebook application “Causes”, and over 400 Tea Party Patriots groups have used NCPA materials to prepare for the July 17th National Health Care Tea Parties.

Yet a quick search of Google News, which to me has become a poormans version of Lexus Nexus, there has not been one media mention of the National Center for Policy Analysis effort on healthcare in any of the news outlets that Google News indexes, with exception of the press releases on pr newswire sites that are picked up on by Google News.

You would think that given the National Center for Policy Analysis track record of being a conservative voice in all of the major policy debates, that some news outlets would take notice.