Articles Tagged ‘Hot Air’

Blogging right reacts to Snowe ‘defection’

Wednesday, October 14th, 2009

Republican (or RINO) Sen. Olympia Snowe (Maine) was the sole GOP vote for the ‘Baucus’ bill to pass committee Tuesday.

Hot Air’s Ed Morrissey points out the flaws in Snowe’s “history calls” parsing of her vote.

History?  Certainly, we don’t often see Congressional committees passing summaries instead of writing legislation, so that’s one for the history books.  We also don’t often see Congress passing trillion-dollar bills in a rush, although to be fair, they managed to do it earlier with Porkulus — a bill on which Snowe also helped make “history”.  Unfortunately, we see Snowe often crossing over on critical votes, so that’s neither history nor a surprise.

Wellsy’s World writes that “there are several major reasons why supporters shouldn’t be too overcome with elation, and why opponents shouldn’t despair:”

The Baucus bill does not exist in legislative language form. What passed today was the summary language translation of the Baucus plan. This is what the CBO scored, and when the legislative language is hammered out, it will most likely add costs and adversely affect the budgetary scoring, to say nothing of provisions in the legislative that may be overlooked in the summary form but have hidden consequences for the public.

Perhaps that’s why democratic leadership won’t allow the full text to be published.

“What this all means is that it’s unlikely the Baucus bill will survive in a significant manner under assaults from the liberal wing of the Democratic Party and under spending and taxation concerns from conservatives,” Wellsy adds.

The Weekly Standard had this statement from Republican leader Mitch McConnell, of Kentucky:

The fact is, this proposal will never come before the Senate. But what we do know is that the bill written behind closed doors here in the Capitol will be another 1,000-page, trillion-dollar Washington takeover. We know it will slash a half-trillion dollars from seniors’ Medicare, add new taxes and raise premiums. That’s not reform.

Even Joe Lieberman had criticism for the Baucus bill - salient statements begin around 3:35.

Calls to action:

Gateway Pundit urged their readers to “contact these senators and insist that Americans get a chance to see the full text of the bill before any vote is taken on any so-called health care bill.

“Americans insist:

“Show us the bill!”

… and even provides contact information so readers can “melt the phones.”

RedState’s Erik Erikson goes a step further, asking readers to mail Snowe a bag of rock salt.

Olympia Snowe has sold out the country. Having been banished to our world after Aslan chased her out of Narnia, Snowe is intent on corrupting this place too.

So we should melt her.

What melts snow? Rock salt.

I’m going to ship this 5 pound bag of rock salt to her office in Maine. It’s only $3.00. You should join me.

It is a visible demonstration of our contempt for her. First she votes for the stimulus. Now this.

While Neo Neocon writes, “Snowe certainly gave the bill a nice push by giving Obama the cover he needs to claim a spurious bipartisanship. If there’s anything this bill is not, it’s bipartisan.”

But since Congressional leadership refuses to publish the text of the Baucus bill or require any bill be published before a vote, perhaps the media can publish these comments by liberal economist Robert Reich and pass it as the bill.

NewsBusters P.J. Gladnick reports on the Reich Speech as proof that the
Democrats’ health care plan is for you to “die quickly.”

Enjoy it while it lasts - top reasons Obama’s polling success won’t last

Friday, September 11th, 2009

A CNN snap poll from after Wednesday’s speech looked rosy, showing that viewers increased in their support for Obama’s proposals, from 53% up to 67%.

That’s before you consider CNN totally oversampled Democrats who support reform in the first place.

The problem is way more Democrats watched the speech than Republicans - as if the above numbers wouldn’t tell you that. Compared to the general population Democrats made up 45%, Republicans 18%, and the rest were independent.

“Those [gains] are almost identical to a poll conducted immediately after Bill Clinton’s health care speech before Congress in September, 1993.”

And we all know how that turned out.

CBS Poll

CBS Poll

CBS News hopes their poll will be more credible, showing a more modest 12 percent gain, but most people don’t think reform will help them (or really understand “Obama’s Plan”).

The poll shows Americans now give him the “best marks of his presidency on handling health care,” but people still aren’t sure what his “plan” entails. Only 22 percent said the reforms now being considered would help them personally.

Thursday, CBS re-interviewed 678 adults first questioned August 27-31.

Last week, just 40 percent of these adults approved of how the president was handling health care. More, 47 percent, disapproved. After the speech, 52 percent said they approved and only 38 percent said they disapproved. Those are the best assessments for Mr. Obama’s handling of health care shown all year by CBS News Polls.

CBS Poll

CBS Poll

The re-poll reached 648 of the 678 original respondents and CBS claims the original margin of error at plus or minus 4 percent. “While the error for subgroups is higher, the error on measures of individual change is smaller.”

Based on that poll, Salon.com is caling President Obama’s address to Congress, “mostly, a winner.”

Not so fast.

Politico blogger Glenn Thrush pointed out that Americans are skeptical of polls, however, after the CNN post-speech poll “skewed Democrat.”

One other critical detail I should have added — Obama’s coattails are microscopic: When asked if the bills floating through Congress would help or hurt, 22% said help, 27% said hurt and a whopping 47% said it would have no effect. Those stats are slightly better than a week before but virtually unchanged.

The huge number of undecideds-unsures-pursuadables underscores what the Gallup survey released earlier this week showed, that when it comes to public opinion health care reform — despite all the hype and vitriol — is still basically a jump ball.

Democracy Corps‘ dial-tested focus group of debate-watchers in Denver, Colo. focused on evenly devided swing voters who sided 54 to 46 percent between Obama and John McCain in the 2008 election.

These voters’ support and opposition of the health care plan went from 46 percent for and 46 percent against before the speech, to 66 to 30 percent afterward. In addition, before the speech only 44 percent described the plan as “the right kind of change,” with 52 percent saying it was not. That number then shifted to 50 to 40 percent after the speech.

A Rasmussen survey found only 2 percent increase in support for the Democrats’ health care reform proposal - up to 46 percent since the two days before Obama’s speech.

RealClearPolitics’ Kyle Trygstad points out that, “The speech appears to have had more of an impact on Democrats, though, as Rasmussen reports that the boost comes “entirely from those in the president’s own party.”

“Enjoy it while it lasts, champ, because no one — including liberal Democrats — thinks it will,” writes Hot Air’s Allahpundit.

The One’s struggling just to pull a bare majority. Soon liberals and moderates will start freaking out anew over the public option and then the erosion will begin again. The only thing he can do now to keep Democrats from tearing each other’s throats out is to give them some Republican throats to tear at instead, which, as Karl noted yesterday, is why his speech was so partisan and why the media will continue to wet itself over Joe Wilson for as long as it can.

Twisting the news for a racial narrative

Thursday, August 20th, 2009

MSNBC blatantly cropped a shot of a black man carrying an AR-15 assault rifle outside a Veterans of Foreign Wars town hall meeting with the president in Phoenix, Ariz. to avoid showing any skin color.

Then white host Contessa Brewer abuses the footage to create a racial narrative. “Here you have a man of color in the presidency and white people showing up with guns strapped to their waists or their legs.”

This is followed with a token black anchor who can “legitimately” wax on about racism because of his skin color. “It is real that there is tremendous anger in this country … anger about a black person becoming president.”

He then invokes assasination attempts by Lynette “Squeaky” Fromme and Mark Hinckley.

On a side note, MSNBC also mischaracterizes the protesters as a “pro-health care reform” group.

ABC News Channel 15 in Arizona showed the full-length shot, and even interviewed the well-armed black man, who refused to give his name but definitely opposed reform.

Even so, ABC’s Nicole Beyer points out “You have to remember, this is perfectly legal for him to have this gun out in public for everyone to see.”

The implication is we should change the laws so right-wing gun nuts have to hide in a dark closet to caress their implements of destruction.

CNN shows the full-length clip as well, and notes that Secret Service and local police officers had created a loose cordon around the individual.

Hot Air’s Allahpundit puts the deception into context:

Never will you see a starker example of MSNBC getting away with the sort of deception for which Fox News would be pilloried, especially in the context of race.

Blogger Moe Lane argues that stirring the pot like this is more likely to endanger the president, as tensions already run high this August.

This was an insanely stupid move on MSNBC’s part - and one that was dangerous to the safety of the President of the United States of America, not to mention his security staff. I am appalled that a supposedly reputable news agency would do this.

Reacting to the ‘mob’

Wednesday, August 12th, 2009

The party in power is held to a higher standard than the opposition. By the same token, those holding town hall meetings are held to a higher standard of decorum than those who attend.

How representatives handle protests at their town hall forums tells a lot about their leadership skill, and how the media reacts to the growing dissent tells a lot about their bias.

In Arlen Specter faces fury: ‘You work for us!’ Politico’s Andy Barr gives Democrat Specter mixed reviews for his performance.

Specter (D-Pa.) fired back Tuesday at a raucous town hall audience that booed and jeered him for more than an hour.

Specter immediately tried to temper the rough crowd, which started booing him before the question-and-answer session even began, with the blunt warning: “If you want to stay in here, we’re not going to tolerate any demonstrations or booing. So, it’s up to you.”

But Specter’s assertion that he was not required to attend the town hall was not received so well.

“You work for us!” shouted several members of the crowd. “You work for us!”

Hot Air Blogger Ed Morrissey had a clever twist on the exchange, “He then angered the crowd all over again by reminding them how lucky they are to be in his presence at all.”

Morrissey took exception to the Senator’s lament that he didn’t get any extra pay for holding town hall meetings to get yelled at.

He makes $174,000 a year for a job that requires him to be at the office four days a week when Congress is in session, which is only about 2/3rds of the year. He has a gold-plated medical and dental package that Specter certainly won’t surrender for the ObamaCare system he’s pushing. Thanks to his 30 years in the Senate, he’s eligible for a pension that will pay 80% of that salary and keep his benefits package in place until he dies.

How many of his constituents have that kind of job? How many do you think will be impressed that Specter deigned to receive his subjects without getting a bonus payment to do it? What a great example of Beltway arrogance.

The New Republic’s Michael Crowley heaped praise on Claire McCaskill’s handling of town hall disruptions.

She was pitch-perfect: polite and responsive without being a pushover, armed with clear and compelling facts (emphasis on things any health reform bill will *not* do) and firm when necessary. She shamed one of the loudest hecklers by reminding him that “we have good manners in Missouri,” but without losing her own temper.

Blogger Matthew Yglesias asks the question many liberals are probably feeling:

I don’t understand why members of congress are holding these town halls. There’s been so much focus on the spectacle of the whole thing that nobody’s really stepped back and explained what the purpose of these events are other than to give us pundits something to chat about.

Pennsylvania Gov. Ed Rendell took a new tack in painting the health care opposition with the birther label.

Rendell, a Democrat, told Politico’s Barr that “much of the outrage being demonstrated at town halls across the country comes from so-called birthers, whom he described as ‘absolutely nuts’.”

“I’ve never seen ugliness and rage like this in all my years in office,” the two-term governor and former Philadelphia mayor said.

While birthers are a small fraction of the opposition, both Specter and McCaskill were shouted down by audience members who questioned the president’s natural born citizen credentials, and the issue has nearly derailed most town hall meetings on health care reform.

It’s feeding frenzy time in the Blogosphere

Friday, July 10th, 2009

There is blood in the water - Democrats are hesitating, the healthcare reform express has stalled just out of the station, and bloggers on both sides of the fence are circling.

“The news from pollsters and constituents look pretty bad for Democrats looking towards a midterm election in the middle of a deep recession and escalating unemployment,” says Hot Air blogger Ed Morrissey.

Dan Riehl’s Riehl World View heaped scorn on the democrats:

What’s more costly, that our Democrat government is inept, or health care reform? Unfortunately, they are one and the same. Already behind schedule, they’ve suddenly realized they may actually have to figure out how to pay for it. I realize that’s all but unheard of in Washington these days, but geesh. If they think they are going to change everyone in America’s health care and a huge portion of the nation’s GDP with some last minute, too important to read BS, they are going to be thrown out in droves come 2010. Unfortunately, for the Democrat majority, at least, that may already be inevitable. Still, they are intent on making it worse. I won’t be sorry to see them go.

Punk Patriot’s rant on why we have to “watch what’s happening on the Hill” took aim at the Democrats’ “corporate welfare” healthcare reform measures as well as Republican fears of socialism on Dandelion Salad.

Josh Greenman, writing in the New York Daily News opinion section, takes Obama to task for not providing enough detail - the president’s pledge to let Congress develop a consensus.
“This is like a car salesman who tells you everything that’s wrong with the clunker you currently drive without letting you take the vehicle he’s trying to sell you around the block for a spin.
“But why trade up when you may wind up with a broken-down jalopy, especially when it’s going to cost you an arm and a leg up-front?”

Read more: