Articles Tagged ‘healthcare reform’

FreedomWorks “Apologizes” to Liberals for Resistance, Receives Hate Calls from Left

Wednesday, August 12th, 2009

In a statement issued yesterday by the pro-free market group FreedomWorks, the organization offered an “abject apology” to the Left, including moveon.org, the Democratic National Committee (DNC), ACORN and the AFL-CIO, for their “apparent ignorance of the fine art of political discourse.”

FreedomWorks’ August Recess Call to Action encouraged grassroots citizens to attend Congressional town hall meetings and listening sessions.  We asked everyone to voice their opinions and communicate their opposition to the President’s proposed hostile takeover of the American health care system.  Apparently, the very act of showing up and having an opinion is, in effect, to act like a “thug.”  Opposing President Obama’s policy agenda on health care is, in and of itself, unacceptable, and has no place in our democracy.  Bottom line: it’s “disgusting,” according to our friends on the left.

We didn’t know this.  Evidently, we also didn’t know best practices in a respectful, dignified policy debate, but our leftist friends were kind enough to “take FreedomWorks to school”, so to speak.

Specifically, “school” included phone call blitzes from MoveOn.org and the AFL-CIO that jammed FreedomWorks phone lines and filled up staff voice mail boxes.  Callers’ consistently used profanity, vulgarity, ever-popular references to “Nazis” and “brown-shirters,” racial slurs targeting an African-American staffer, and even veiled threats of violence and bodily harm.

Now we know how an intelligent political debate unfolds.  Thank You! 

The release also included a small sampling of some of the hateful, often vulgar, phone calls that FreedomWorks has received from folks in favor of Obamacare. Note: some examples contain strong language that readers might find offensive. Here are a few, including links, submitted by FreedomWorks:

Please click on the links below (WARNING:  If you, like the uninformed members of FreedomWorks, do not have an appropriately sophisticated and  “progressive” view of political discourse, you may find the content of these recordings extremely offensive. They use profanity, crude sexual innuendo, racist remarks, and very, very bad English):

Call 1 <http://www.freedomworks.org/files/Call%20D.WAV> : “You’re a total d**khead. Bye-bye, you little a**hole.”

Call 2: <http://www.freedomworks.org/files/Call%20L.WAV>  “You all suffer from the same f**king problem: you didn’t get laid enough when you were younger because you’re 5’ 3”. … Girls never paid any attention to you… You’re a little f**king dweeb who f**king didn’t get any p**** his whole f**king life… You’re a little f**king piece of shit and I would f**king step on  your fu**king head quicker than you could shake a stick out, if I had the chance… You’re the f**king minority.”

Call 3: <http://www.freedomworks.org/files/Call%20B.wav>  We are using tactics like Hitler to disrupt democracy. “If I have to pick up a weapon…then I will.”

Call 4: <http://www.freedomworks.org/files/Call%20M.WAV>  Heavy breather.

Call 5: <http://www.freedomworks.org/files/Call%20C.wav>  “F**king buddies’ wives…”

Call 6: <http://www.freedomworks.org/files/Call%20K.WAV>  Very creepy: “Stop disrupting my democracy with Nazi, Brownshirt tactics…you immoral bast****.”

Call 7: <http://www.freedomworks.org/files/Call%20G.WAV>  Threat to respond violently to town hall attendees. “I hope this backfires on that piece of s*** Dick Armey.”

Call 8: <http://www.freedomworks.org/files/Call%20A.wav>  “I hope you have a hard time sleeping at night.”

Call 9: <http://www.freedomworks.org/files/Call%20H.WAV>  “You are almost as bad as the communists… You’re from out of the country, obviously.”

Call 10: <http://www.freedomworks.org/files/Call%20F.wav>  “Your Brownshirt tactics are unacceptable, un-American.”

Obviously, the Left has mastered the art of civil discourse regarding public policy in America. Unfortunately for FreedomWorks, their voicemail gets to record them practicing it.

Far Left Blog Labels 60 Plus Association Ad as ‘Dangerous’

Wednesday, August 12th, 2009

The Reaction, a far-left dumping ground that coyly identifies itself as ‘liberalism unbound,’ stated in a blog post on Monday, August 10th, that “without a strong push back” a new advertisement produced by 60 Plus Association – a seventeen year-old nonpartisan senior citizens advocacy group often referred to as the ‘conservative alternative to the AARP’ – “could be healthcare reform’s swift boat to oblivion.” Or is it in fact the other way around? Is it actually The Reaction that is swift-boating the American public?

For those unfamiliar with the term, ‘swift-boating’ is American political jargon that is used as a strong pejorative description of some kind of attack that the individual deems to be unfair or untrue. It came about as a result of the Swift Vets and POWs for Truth, a 527 political group formed during the 2004 presidential campaign to oppose Democratic candidate John Kerry, and its companion book, Unfit for Command, written by John E. O’Neill and Jerome R. Corsi, Ph.D.

Entitled “Sacrifice,” the ad states that seniors today, The Greatest Generation, have spent their lives sacrificing to protect freedom and strengthen our nation. From landing at Normandy, to raising strong families and building successful businesses, these men and women have remained dedicated to their country. Now, in seniors’ most vulnerable stage of life, President Obama and Congress are asking them to sacrifice even more by cutting Medicare to pay for healthcare reform, meaning long waits for care and even possible denial of care.

But perhaps the scariest part, the ad says, is that the government, not your doctor, decides if older patients are worth the cost. And the cruel joke is that many politicians are designing a health care plan for the country that they themselves are exempted from.

“Tell Congress don’t pay for healthcare reform on the backs of our seniors. They’ve sacrificed enough,” ends the ad.

An article written for the New York Times – yes, THE New York Times – states the more and more primary care doctors are opting out of treating seniors on Medicare. Last year “29% of the Medicare beneficiaries it [New York Times] surveyed who were looking for a primary care doctor had a problem finding one to treat them, up from 24%” in 2007. Combine this with the fact that this nation is facing a severe doctor shortage. The introduction of the president’s public option proposal stands to make an increasingly disastrous problem far worse. The proposed $500 billion cuts in Medicare reimbursements to health care providers will only serve to escalate the number of doctors unwilling to treat seniors enrolled in the program. Add to this the fact that the introduction of a ‘public option’ will reduce annual net incomes of private hospitals by at least $36 billion, which in turn would lower the annual net income of physicians and nurses, thereby increasing the country’s doctor shortage – current doctors will choose to retire early and college students who once considered a medical degree will instead pursue another field of education.

So, those at The Reaction, what is it then about this advertisement that is untrue?

Obama’s Cookie Cutter Grassroots

Monday, August 10th, 2009

The Democratic National Committee and healthcare reform leaders in New Jersey show the the little faith they have in their constituents and how much free time they have on their hands there.  An office visit sheet is being sent around to all healthcare reform supporters, the first page explains in a page long step by step what to do before, during, and after a visit to your congressman.  Almost as if the constituents are unaware of how to speak to someone.  The steps even include reminding the person to introduce themselves and that they are constituents.  These things seem to underestimate the intelligence of people in New Jersey.  Then there is a sheet that is a step by step piece to give to the congressman.  And if the congressman who has been in Congress and heard the debates does not know the President’s 8 guarantees, they are listed out again. This may have been thought of so that it looks like the constituents knows what they are handing the congressman, but they don’t have to write it or even read it really, so it is a pointless piece.  Next, are three point that every congressman in New Jersey should know already about how healthcare is affecting New Jersey.  This is an insult to the congressmen who receive this; its saying “hey you are in congress and I voted you there, but I think you are too stupid and uncaring about my state to know these facts, so I will make sure I tell them to you.”  Then a very small box is left for the constituent to write their healthcare story or why they support the healthcare reform bill.  Lastly, there is a place for the person to sign, put your address and phone number on it as proof for the congressman.  One of the steps “During Your Visit” is to leave your name and phone number with the person you talk to so that you know you are heard, is it really necessary to leave your number twice? And another thing is to ask for their support… Isn’t that what is being done with the sheet?  The entire thing is repetitive and wasting time in general.  Someone took the time to come up with this, it is always nice to see what people get paid to do in that area of the government.  Now that paper, time, money, resources, and work hours have been wasted for this page, it is sent to the people of New Jersey, who should be insulted that the healthcare reformers think that they need this.

These tactics often accomplish little to no results.  Congressmen may say that they read or pay attention to the cookie cutter sheets, but if these sheets make us wonder if the people bringing them in really know what they are bringing in, then it has probably crossed the congressman’s mind as well.  Congressmen have so much on their plates that these cookie cutter sheets are often ignored.  And that’s even if people bring them in.  Many people ignore them or cannot “find” the time to bring them to their congressman, so in many cases these are a waste of time because if they do get printed out most times people will forget them with their busy lives.  A waste of the resources that the Democratic National Committee has, and a waste of the money that they are shoveling out to workers to get these out and the bill passed.

America’s Hall Monitor: White House Demands Intel on Right’s “Disinformation”

Tuesday, August 4th, 2009

HCHR’s own Matt Margolis reported yesterday that the White House, or Emanuel Bros. & Co., has been forced to spend a great deal of time reconciling President Obama’s current stance on health care reform, perspectives he’s offered in the past and what he actually intends for the future of health care in America.

In attempts to streamline their efforts, the White House has used new media sites, such as Twitter, to use taxpayer-funded communications resources to promote the Obama Administration’s legislation that would create a government overhaul of health care in America. They’re also using these media to play defense, asking supporters to alert the White House of any “disinformation” disseminated from opposing camps.

In a White House blog, entitled “Facts are Stubborn Things” published today, Emanuel Bros. & Co. explained that those who oppose Obamacare are spreading “scary chain emails and videos,” proving yet again how absolutely patronizing and condescending this administration can be. They portray the American people as simpleton victims who cannot possibly discern what is right and wrong for themselves, but instead, fall prey to those on the Right.

They take this attitude a step further by offering lowly Americans with an “important” task:

There is a lot of disinformation about health insurance reform out there, spanning from control of personal finances to end of life care.  These rumors often travel just below the surface via chain emails or through casual conversation.  Since we can’t keep track of all of them here at the White House, we’re asking for your help. If you get an email or see something on the web about health insurance reform that seems fishy, send it to flag@whitehouse.gov.

This request serves two purposes. First, it makes the American people feel as though they are a part of the fight for expanded health care coverage, but really, they are giving them some tiny task, like a mother allowing a child to help stir batter to make a cake, in hopes of their supporters feeling like they’ve done something. Secondly, it allows for the White House to really take advantage of their new role: America’s hall monitor.

To assert that anyone who opposes them is spouting off bad information is intellectually dishonest. Just as Emanuel Bros. & Co. founder Rahm Emanuel has been accused of undercutting those who stand in his way, they want to take it one step further and keep tabs on those who simply disagree with President Obama’s legislative proposals. Groups they would monitor especially closely? Try Tea Party Patriots, American Liberty Alliance, American Majority, Americans for Prosperity, Conservatives for Patients’ Rights, Americans for Tax Reform… and so on and so forth.

And why would they do this? Given the fact that the majority of Americans oppose Obamacare, it would sure take a lot of time to defend against every accusation catapulted in their direction. Furthermore, even if their claims are false (which they are not), any sort of legal action against them would prove futile, since First Amendment protections of speech are very rarely forfeited and even harder to refute for public figures. 

Since any opinion contradictory to that released by Emanuel Bros. & Co. is now considered “disinformation,” those on the Center-Right should keep the White House occupied by continuing to send out more of it during August recess. It’s fun to keep government employees busy.

Attack Dog: Rahm Emanuel Brings Chicago-Style Techniques to National Stage

Tuesday, August 4th, 2009

In a letter submitted today, Congressman Darrell Issa (R-CA), who serves as ranking member of the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, boldly demanded that Rahm Emanuel, Chief of Staff for President Obama’s administration, cease his behind-the-scenes manipulation to ram legislation through Congress quickly to promote the President’s agenda.

Congressman Issa references Emanuel’s Chicago-style tactics that attempt to punish anyone who stands in his or President Obama’s way:

As you know, Senator John Kyl (R-AZ) recently raised questions about the failure of the stimulus and suggested on a national television show that stimulus money scheduled to be spent in future years ought to be returned to the American taxpayers. Following Senator Kyl’s remarks, according to Politico, you coordinated an “assault” on Senator Kyl and other critics of your policies by directing four cabinet secretaries to write to Jan Brewer, governor of Arizona, asking pointedly if, in light of Senator Kyle’s remarks, Governor Brewer wished to forfeit taxpayer money directed to Arizona by the stimulus. These tactics have been characterized as a “fist to the nose” and a message to “Back off.” While this type of scare tactic may work in Chicago, it will not work to intimidate me or other Members of the United States Congress.

Congressman Issa even includes a glossary of definitions he uses in the memo, so as not to allow for misinterpretation. He even issues this harsh accusation:

At what point do you believe your practice of Chicago-style politics violates a public official’s right to speak out in favor of alternative policies?

Indeed, this is the sentiment expressed by many who have endured run-ins with President Obama’s Chief-of-Staff. Emanuel, known especially for sending a dead fish as a threat to a pollster who angered him some 20 years ago, does not seem to shy away from such a “tough guy” characterization, but rather, relishes in it as a means of maintaining influence inside the Beltway. According to Time Magazine, many have described Emanuel as a “profane, hyperactive attack dog.” Chuck Fant, press secretary for Congressman John M. Spratt (D-SC), once said about Emanuel’s reactions to an unpopular proposal by then-President George W. Bush, “Rahm smelled blood. He latched on like a pit bull and never let go.”

And what exactly is this profane, hyperactive pit bull doing about health care reform?

Well, first, he’s elevated those are closest to him, including his own brother, Ezekiel. Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel became the chief health care adviser  early in the Obama administration.  One can’t help but assume that like anything else done in Chicago’s inner political circles, the person who was to fill this position wasn’t assigned through a blind interviewing process.

Dr. Emanuel, or “Zeke” as he is called by some, is a bioethicist who wrote the book, ”Health Care Guaranteed” (angle not unclear). He is now tapped to parade around media circuits as their doctor witness on behalf of the cause and most recently, was sent over to the non-partisan Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to oversee health care reform legislation scoring. Zeke must be rather busy these days after the OMB offered less-than-favorable estimates, though probably still low-balled at that, of the cost of Obama’s health care reform proposals. We wonder if the folks at OMB should worry about receiving a dead fish in their cubicles.

Next, Rahm Emanuel has been awfully busy setting, resetting and ultimately, postponing deadlines for passage of health care reform legislation. What was supposed to be finished by mid-July then late July has been pushed off to after Congress’s August recess. In fact, Emanuel promised on July 24, 2009, just one week before the House adjourned for recess, that the bill would receive an up-or-down vote before the Congressional holiday. Unsurprisingly, he was wrong. And one thing we all know about mobster-wannabes, they hate being embarrassed.

A stalled vote poses a problem for Emanuel Bros. and Co., formerly known as the Obama Administration, as they are quite aware that the response in Congressional districts around the U.S. will be strongly in opposition to President Obama’s proposals to create a government overhaul of health care, resulting in the rationing of care, decrease in quality, stagnation of innovation in technology and treatments, hiking of taxes and ultimately, a decrease in an overall quality of life.

Still, Emanuel will not be discouraged. Emanuel called a goal of universal health care “non-negotiable,” in a recent Wall Street Journal piece. Also in the Wall Street Journal, Emanuel admitted just days after President Obama’s election in 2008, that he would not accept minor reforms to the health care systems, but instead, require “big, serious” changes.  Emanuel believes that now is the time to institute these sweeping reforms that result in a complete government takeover of health care. With a crippled economy, it would make sense for the President’s top strategist to shift gears and attempt to convince Americans that the key to alleviating America’s financial headaches is to pass health care reform. After all, as Mr. Emanuel said himself, “A crisis is a terrible thing to waste.”

Patient-Physician Relationship Strangely Absent from Debate

Monday, August 3rd, 2009

In the video embedded below, Dr. C.L. Gray, a practicing Board certified internal medicine physician out of western North Carolina who runs the advocacy group Physicians for Reform, discusses the changes that would be implemented under President Obama’s health care reform legislation and the comparisons this plan draws to the Oregon Health Plan.

Specifically, he tells the story of an Oregon woman named Barbara Wagner who was diagnosed with lung cancer in spring 2008. But rather then provide her with the aggressive treatment of Tarceva, a new chemotherapy, her oncologist recommended, the bureaucrats who ran the Oregon Health Plan, a program created in 1994 to give the state’s working poor access to basic health care while limiting costs by ‘prioritizing care’, instead offered her two alternate options – hospice care or physician assisted suicide, both of which would be paid for by the state. In 1997, Oregon passed the Death with Dignity Act, thus legalizing physician assisted suicide so that it could be provided for patients who chose to die without further medical treatment. This combined with the already institutionalized state-run health care system secured the power the government needed to ration health care in order to control its financial risk.

When pressed for a reason why the state of Oregon was withholding treatment Barbara Wagner desperately needed to save her life, both Dr. Walter Shaffer, spokesman for Oregon’s Division of Medical Assistance Programs, and Dr. Som Saha, chairman of the commission that sets policy for the Oregon Health Plan, echoed nearly identical statements in which they said, “We can’t cover everything for everyone. Taxpayer dollars are limited for publicly funded programs. We try to come up with policies that provide the most good for the most people.” And this is just a state-run health care system with a population of a little over three million people. Imagine what it is going to be like with the federal bureaucracy at the helm and a population a hundred times that of Oregon’s!

Dr. C.L. Gray notes in his video, “What is strangely absent from these discussions is any mention of patient-physician relationship.”

Of course what Dr. Gray is saying is nothing new for those who have paid careful attention to the health care debate. We all remember President Obama’s response to Jane Sturm’s question during the ABC News ObamaCare infomercial – on second thought, based on the ratings it’s not likely – on whether his health care reform plan took into account “the spirit or the joy of life” when treating the elderly:

This isn’t to say that Dr. Gray’s reiteration of this precise point is irrelevant. Quite the opposite. As the race heats up to get anything passed, it is imperative that this story keeps being repeated.

Patients First Bus Tour to Keep Pressure on Key Senators During Recess

Thursday, July 30th, 2009

pf-bus-pic-4Key senators in the ongoing healthcare debate wanting to take some time away from the chaotic political fracas Congress finds itself marred in right now and simply relax within each of their own respective home states during the upcoming legislative recess may be in for quite a rude awakening. At least that is what organizers of the Patients First thirteen-state bus tours are hoping will occur.

Patients First, a project of Americans for Prosperity, the nation’s premier grassroots organization committed to advancing every individual’s right to economic freedom and opportunity, is a rallying cry for citizens of this country concerned about the direction in which our health care system is being dragged forcibly toward, a way in which American across the country can organize themselves in order to successfully combat the lobbyists, unions, and politicians in Washington trying to seize control of our health care. “Americans are fired up about health care, and the bus tour gives more people the opportunity to come out and get involved,” said Amy Menefee, spokesperson for Patients First. “They’ve heard enough proposals from Washington that give government all the decision-making power. It is time for citizens to tell their legislators to stop, turn around, and pursue real reforms that put patients first.”

Launched this past Saturday (July 25th) in Richmond, the inaugural Patients First bus is expected to continue its tour through the state of Virginia, making twenty-six stops within that territory alone, and eventually proceeding on to North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Indiana, and Louisiana. The second bus, which begins its tour of duty on Monday, August 3rd, will travel through Nebraska, Colorado, North and South Dakota, Montana, Iowa, Arkansas, and Missouri. Both buses are expected to wrap up their tours on Friday, August 28th. View a map of the Patients First bus tour to locate specific stops on the route.

Constituents at each stop are urged by organizers to call or visit their senators and sign a petition that asks members of Congress to “oppose any legislation that imposes greater government control over my health care that would mean fewer choices for me and my family and even deny treatments to those in need.” The goal of the project is to have 250,000 individuals sign the petition by the time Congress reconvenes. So far 164,882 people have signed it, leaving a little over 85,000 signatures left to go.

“These proposals would change everything about health care as we know it. Instead of patients and doctors making decisions, it would be government bureaucrats,” said Menefee. “We’ve got to let lawmakers know that the American people simply don’t want a government takeover of their health care.”

pf-bus-pic-1  pf-bus-pic-2  pf-bus-pic-3

5 Key Freedoms Lost under Proposed Reform

Wednesday, July 29th, 2009

According to CNNMoney.com and Shawn Tully, the 2,000 page healthcare reform bill that is being presented to Congress is really hiding more than most know.  Shawn found some very interesting news while reading through the very long document.  Beyond the “web of restrictions, fines, and mandates…” as Tully calls them and increased red tape is something worse: freedoms that we now have being stripped away.

These 5 Freedoms are:

  1. The Freedom to Choose What’s in your plan
  2. The Freedom to get rewarded for healthy living/ or to pay your real costs
  3. The Freedom to Choose high-deductible coverage
  4. The Freedom to keep your existing plan
  5. The Freedom to Choose your own doctors

Getting to choose whats in your plan right now is something that has helped people.  Kids just graduating from college and people in their 20’s normally get less coverage plans than someone who is in their 40’s.  But thats their choice, and they pay less for getting less.  Under new healthcare reform, this choice would be made for you by the government in all its…wisdom.  There would be a minimum of coverage that every person must have.  Today many states have a basic minimum that must be covered, and many medical professions lobby to be included on the lists.  And according to Tully that is one of the main reasons prices are spiking now.  Things like children being covered under a parent’s insurance until the age of 26, would help keep the price of the new reform up as well.

The next one is important because it will cause the rise in cost for the healthy.  First because there would be no reward for people who live healthy.  Right now people with low-cholesterol or who eat healthy etc, get a break in the costs with some insurance companies.  This would not be legal under the new reform. Thenbecause right now people who have preexisting conditions and the elderly pay more.  This is mainly because they will be using the insurance more than a healthy 24 year-old; a 45 year-old with a heart condition or liver problems will pay more than that 24 year-old because the 45 year-old will be visiting doctors more.  Under the new reform, this extra cost the is put upon the individual with the condition would be shifted to the masses.  So that the entire country will pay for the extra cost these people incur. Tully gives this example:

Under the Senate plan, insurers would be barred from charging any more than twice as much for one patient vs. any other patient with the same coverage. So if a 20-year-old who costs just $800 a year to insure is forced to pay $2,500, a 62-year-old who costs $7,500 would pay no more than $5,000

The next freedom that will be stripped away is the freedom to choose high-deductible coverage.  Right now many people are choosing to switch to a consumer-driven healthcare where the doctors and tests are covered out of pocket by the person, but all the bigger stuff is covered.  The implimenting of a minimum would destroy this.

Fourth is one that hits home with many.  The President keeps telling the Nation that everyone will be able to keep their existing healthcare plan.  Well if we start by taking out everyone who has a plan right now that is under this “minimum” plan or doesn’ t have a minimum.  Barring those people from the President’s Nation, most employers will be offered a two prices per employee concerning healthcare: one will be the price for the reformed healthcare and the other higher cost one will be to let the employees keep their old insurance plan.  Plus under employment law there is “qualified” health benefits, and those that are not part of the new reformed plan will no longer be considered “qualified” so they will be forced out of their existing plans in no more than 5 years.

Lastly and most importantly, you will lose your choice of doctors.  Right now under most insurance plans you have a certain number of doctors in a certain specialty that you can choose from.  But under the new reform, there will be a gatekeeper who will assign you a primary doctor and that doctor will have control over which specialists you see.  This primary care doctor will also decide what tests you will need and when it is time for you to see a specialist.  Say goodbye to 2nd opinions.  This sounds ok until you remember that these doctors are government paid, they are suppose to guide their patients to the right tests and treatments, and by “right” they mean most cost-efficient.  Doctors will get paid to deny expensive treatments to patients as HMO doctors did so many years ago that led to the program to be so unpopular.

These freedoms are things that people don’t seem to notice now, mainly because they have always been there, but when they are gone, we as a Nation will feel the difference.  And the Damage.

Have Blue Dog Democrats Sold Out on Health Care?

Wednesday, July 29th, 2009

It never ceases to amaze those in the realm of political discourse how things can change so quickly in so little time. Less than a day after a memo from David L. Cavicke, Republican Chief of Staff for the Committee on Energy and Commerce, was leaked and obtained by Politico in which it was revealed that “Democratic Leadership” had “told Mr. Boehner’s staff that there will be no vote on Health on the Floor before recess and we will leave Friday,” an apparent breakthrough has been made on the Blue Dog Democrat front of the health care reform battle. What this last-minute deal means – a victory for ObamaCare and the Democratic leadership or simple a face-saving rouse – has yet to be seen.

Fox News is reporting that a deal was reached early this morning. The compromise, according to one member of the fiscally conservative Blue Dog Coalition, “would cut the cost of the $1 trillion-plus package by $100 billion” and would “ensure that the proposed government-run insurance program would not be forced on anyone.” In exchange, the floor vote in the House will be put off until after Labor Day when legislators reconvene. Seven Blue Dog Democrats held up passage of the bill within the Committee on Energy and Commerce, the only panel within the House not to pass some form of the president’s health care reform legislation, over growing concerns for the high-cost of the program and the speed at which Democratic leadership was trying to force a vote. Four of those seven Blue Dogs on the committee – Representatives Mike Ross of Arkansas, Baron Hill of Indiana, Zack Space of Ohio, and Bart Gordon of Tennessee – relented and agreed on passage of the bill this morning. This gives Chairman Henry Waxman, representative from California, just enough votes to pass the bill through the committee. It is expected that the committee will meet up this afternoon for mark-up, or finalization, of the bill.

What will happen to President Obama’s health care reform legislation hereafter is anyone’s guess at this point. This is hardly a victory for the White House and the Democratic leadership in Congress, however. There is no physical bill for the president to sign – undoubtedly though he will go out among the masses at his town-hall revivals and proclaim, quite prematurely, “Mission: Accomplished” on ‘meeting’ his August deadline – and there will not be a floor vote on the bill until after Labor Day. At most this ‘deal’ was simply a face-saving maneuver for Obama and Nancy Pelosi going into recess. Still, the choice for the Democrats to take the fight over health care reform in this direction is a double-edged sword for them. Going into recess with nothing would have been hugely embarrassing for the Democrats. Congressional Republicans would have touted this as a victory for their cause and rightfully so. At least with this, they can proclaim that they accomplished something, even if what they eventually did produce lacked any real teeth. No doubt their friends in the mainstream media will gleefully help mask this rouse as a victory for the White House.

But, at the same time, opponents of the president’s legislation have gained a vital opportunity as well. They now have a fixed target date and, quite possibly by the time both houses of Congress break for recess, will have actual legislation to cite. This basically allots them weeks of free-range target practice in which to take pot shots at moderate ‘Blue Dog’ Democrats for not reading the bill. They’ll have plenty of ammo to use. For example, the fact that the $100 billion ‘cut’ from the program is a mere spit in the bucket compared to the overall $900 billion cost.

One has to also take note that while this not be a solid victory for the Democrats, neither is it defeat. The fight is just beginning. Nancy Pelosi still only needs thirteen or fourteen of the fifty-two Blue Dog Democrats to pass the bill on the floor on a razor-thin majority vote.

Rep. Conyers Sees No Need to Read Health Care Bill

Tuesday, July 28th, 2009

Democratic Representative John Conyers of Michigan, speaking at a luncheon sponsored by the National Press Club in Washington D.C. this past Friday, July 24th, questioned what the point was in his Congressional colleagues even bothering to read the one-thousand page health care reform bill the White House is adamantly trying to get passed, at least in one form or another, before the August 7th recess.

Conyers, Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, stated, “I love these members, they get up and say, ‘Read the bill.’ What good is reading the bill if it’s a thousand pages and you don’t have two days and two lawyers to find out what it means after you read the bill?”

CNS News produced the following clip of Representative Conyer’s speech:

Umm, perhaps for the simple reason that you have an obligation toward the people of your state to read a bill before voting on it? The fact that members of Congress don’t read every bill that is ultimately voted upon is nothing new. It has begrudgingly become an accepted reality of American political culture. But for a Congressional member like Conyers who has served as long as he has – he is the second-longest serving incumbent member of the House and the fifth-longest in both houses – to make such a statement in front of members of the press in regards to a bill as controversial as ObamaCare has become is absolutely astonishing. No one would sign a contract without reading it first, so why should federal legislators? One has to question Conyers why, if it takes two lawyers and yourself more then two days to figure out what exactly a bill contains, should you be voting on it in the first place?

[UPDATE] Representative Paul Ryan of Wisconsin on MSNBC explaining why legislators should consider reading the bill before voting on it:

Evden eve nakliyat firmaları ile müşteriler burada buluşuyor, uygun taşımacılık bizde yapılır evden eve nakliyat evden eve nakliyat %100 dogal vpills penis büyütücü gercegin özü penis büyütücü porno burdan izlenir bence sende porno izle bu sitede yada sikiş porno izle bence porno izle bu sitedeporno sikiş sende sikiş sikiş sex ve sex izle bu sitede sex porno burdan izlenir bence sende porno izle bu sitede yada sikiş porno izle bence porno izle bu sitedeporno sikiş sende sikiş sikiş porno gel burda indirporno izle porno film izle burda porno film porno gel izleporno Freepornsexx.com - Free porn, Porn, Free porn tube, Porno, Sikiş, Sex, XXX porn, Sex videos, Hot sex porno Freepornsexx.com - Free porn, Porn, Free porn tube, Porno, Sikiş, Sex, XXX porn, Sex videos, Hot sexporn gel sende porno sikiş burda izle sikiş gel sende porno sikiş burda porno izle porno gel sende porno sikiş burda porno porno izle porno burdan izlenir bence sende porno izle bu sitede yada sikiş porno izle bence porno izle bu sitedeporno sikiş sende sikiş sikiş porno filmleri bu sitede izle sikiş ve porno filmler için en ideal site bu porno izle sitesidir. sikiş sikiş videoları porno sikiş Tüm sikiş filmleri bu site sen nerdesin ? yerli tüm sikiş filmlerini bu sikiş sitesinde izleyin. Diğer sitelerden farklı videolar bu sitede. Sizde porno izleyin. Evden Eve Kayseri denince ilk akla gelen firma olan Kaytaş nakliyat müşterilerine en iyi ve sorunsuz hizmeti sunmaktadır. Kaytaş nakliyat sigortalı olarak yaptığı nakliye işlemini eşyalarınızın taşınması sırasında oluşabilecek sorunlarda sorumluluğu üstüne almaktadır. Kayseri Evden Eve alanında zirve de olan Kaytaş nakliyat yaptığı titiz taşımacılık ile her zaman tercih edilmiş ve edilmeye devam ediyor.Sizde Kaytaş Evden Eve Kayseri ile sorunsuz bir taşıma için iletişime geçin. sohbet sohbet sohbet çocuk oyunları video izle