Articles Tagged ‘health care’

Required

Wednesday, September 16th, 2009

The latest video from Republican Whip Eric Cantor, representative for the 7th Congressional District of Virginia, focuses on the claim made by both the president and Congressional Democrats that if you want to keep your insurance, you can.

In his speech to the joint-session of Congress focusing on his public-option health care proposal, President Barack Obama said, “Let me repeat this – nothing in our plan requires you to change what you have.” And yet on July 16th, when a Democratic staff member explained the health care bill itself, one word stuck out prominently among all others – require. It is repeated eighty-four times throughout the hearing. Why is it that the Democrats who say you can keep your plan require so much of you in order to do so?

Far Left Blog Labels 60 Plus Association Ad as ‘Dangerous’

Wednesday, August 12th, 2009

The Reaction, a far-left dumping ground that coyly identifies itself as ‘liberalism unbound,’ stated in a blog post on Monday, August 10th, that “without a strong push back” a new advertisement produced by 60 Plus Association – a seventeen year-old nonpartisan senior citizens advocacy group often referred to as the ‘conservative alternative to the AARP’ – “could be healthcare reform’s swift boat to oblivion.” Or is it in fact the other way around? Is it actually The Reaction that is swift-boating the American public?

For those unfamiliar with the term, ‘swift-boating’ is American political jargon that is used as a strong pejorative description of some kind of attack that the individual deems to be unfair or untrue. It came about as a result of the Swift Vets and POWs for Truth, a 527 political group formed during the 2004 presidential campaign to oppose Democratic candidate John Kerry, and its companion book, Unfit for Command, written by John E. O’Neill and Jerome R. Corsi, Ph.D.

Entitled “Sacrifice,” the ad states that seniors today, The Greatest Generation, have spent their lives sacrificing to protect freedom and strengthen our nation. From landing at Normandy, to raising strong families and building successful businesses, these men and women have remained dedicated to their country. Now, in seniors’ most vulnerable stage of life, President Obama and Congress are asking them to sacrifice even more by cutting Medicare to pay for healthcare reform, meaning long waits for care and even possible denial of care.

But perhaps the scariest part, the ad says, is that the government, not your doctor, decides if older patients are worth the cost. And the cruel joke is that many politicians are designing a health care plan for the country that they themselves are exempted from.

“Tell Congress don’t pay for healthcare reform on the backs of our seniors. They’ve sacrificed enough,” ends the ad.

An article written for the New York Times – yes, THE New York Times – states the more and more primary care doctors are opting out of treating seniors on Medicare. Last year “29% of the Medicare beneficiaries it [New York Times] surveyed who were looking for a primary care doctor had a problem finding one to treat them, up from 24%” in 2007. Combine this with the fact that this nation is facing a severe doctor shortage. The introduction of the president’s public option proposal stands to make an increasingly disastrous problem far worse. The proposed $500 billion cuts in Medicare reimbursements to health care providers will only serve to escalate the number of doctors unwilling to treat seniors enrolled in the program. Add to this the fact that the introduction of a ‘public option’ will reduce annual net incomes of private hospitals by at least $36 billion, which in turn would lower the annual net income of physicians and nurses, thereby increasing the country’s doctor shortage – current doctors will choose to retire early and college students who once considered a medical degree will instead pursue another field of education.

So, those at The Reaction, what is it then about this advertisement that is untrue?

The perfect storm part 2: Media attention magnifying glass

Tuesday, August 11th, 2009

The nation is primed to fight over health care reform. The big question is will the media fan the flames of conflict or help facilitate an intelligent discussion.

The news-as-entertainment model exemplified by Rush Limbaugh’s Hitler references, shrieker Glenn Beck, liberal Keith Olbermann, and Lou Dobbs - giving new life to the sad Birther spectacle - serve mainly to whip up rhetorical ploys that detract from intelligent debate.

Add that to memos on how to “rattle” pro-reform congressmen at town halls, and now SEIU playbook pages on how to counter anti-reform protests and it’s not surprising blood has already been drawn at the town hall.

News Channel 8 photo by CHRIS COYNER

News Channel 8 photo by CHRIS COYNER

Is the media playing one side over the other?

The Tampa Bay Online significantly altered its coverage of the above town hall brouhaha to play down SEUI tactics.

The original TBO post, available here, quoted SEIU rep. Kim Diehl saying they were ready for opposition protesters, ” ‘We’re prepared. We have strategies to deal with it if it should come up.’ She said the event was important because of disinformation being spread about the health care reform plan.”

The story was later edited to be more SEIU/Democrat friendly:

The  meeting was organized by Reed plus the Service Employees International Union, other unions and Organizing for America, a liberal group that grew out of the Obama presidential campaign.

Reporter William March could not be reached for comment.

Add to the mix Sarah Palin raising the specter of “death panels” that will determine whether life-saving care is economically sensible and you have a nation primed to fight.

Washington Post media comentator Howard Kurtz said the media is not typically left or right - not counting the political commentators mentioned above.

Some hosts push agendas, but overall the media love to keep stirring the pot and reducing everything to melodrama.

The perfect storm: Health care reform town hall riots

Tuesday, August 11th, 2009
Nate Beeler - The Washington Examiner

Nate Beeler - The Washington Examiner

Are we as a nation really ready to throw elbows over health care reform?

Take a media desperate for news, activists on both sides coached from confrontational playbooks, and an issue too close to call, and you have the perfect recipe for what might become known as the month of the town hall riots.

So far, the media has eaten up the story line that mobs of right wing-nuts are being bussed in by corporate interests to emulate grass roots opposition to health care reform.

The Hill’s Mike Soraghan exemplified the unverified claim that opposition demonstrators have been somehow funded by corporate and conservative interests.

The combined effort comes after numerous Democratic lawmakers across the country have been shouted down at town hall meetings by protesters, some of whom are getting help from conservative and business groups.

Soraghan, like many reporters, offers no proof, but his contention has quickly become the media line for the first half of August.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi and House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer went so far as to call the protests “un-American” in a USA Today Op-Ed piece today.

“Americans have been waiting for nearly a century for quality, affordable health care,” the pair claim. In their view, the opposition just wants to drown out “those who wanted to hold a substantive discussion.”

Their attack on the democratic process caused the White House to distance the administration from that characterization of the opposition, according to ABC News‘ Jake Tapper.

“I think there’s actually a pretty long tradition of people shouting at politicians in America,” administration spokesman Bill Burton told reporters on Air Force One.

Meanwhile, the right has tried to make hay over falling support of government run health care.

Rasmussen reports Obama’s “good or excellent” rating as a leader has fallen to 45 percent, down 19 points from his inauguration in January.

Conservative blog Stop the ACLU jumped on the numbers, declaring “Rasmussen must be Unamarican too.”

And polls have shown a similar slip in support for a public health care option, down to just under 50 percent, depending on which poll you read. Rasmussen has support for a single-payer system (slightly to the left of ‘public option’ on the socialism scale) at 32 percent, opposition at 57 points.

Breaking News: SEIU, Rep. Castor Call Last Minute Town Hall, Protestors Clash

Thursday, August 6th, 2009

Hundreds of agitated Floridian citizens opposed to President Obama’s plan to have the federal government take over the health care industry in the United States clashed with SEIU and ACORN drones at a town hall event announced at the last minute by Florida State Representative Betty Reed and Representative for the 11th Congressional District of Florida Kathy Castor; both of them Democrats.

Doors to the event, held at the Children’s Board of Hillsbourough County in downtown Tampa, opened a little before 6pm Eastern Standard Time. Frank’s Posterouswhich was live-blogging the town hall meeting, posted at 5:55pm EST that the “first three rows of seating ALREADY filled with pro-government Healthcare pro-Obama supporters.  Also, signs posted in support of Govt Healthcare.  Chant of ‘Not Fair’ fill the lobby. Lots of anger.”

This of course contradicts the accusations of Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and the rest of the Democratic leadership in Washington that those opposed to the president’s legislation are the one ‘astro-turfing’ the tea party protests at these town hall meetings. Hello, Pot, I’d like you to meet Kettle!

If knowing that pro-Obamacare drones were given front-row seats in advance of the hundreds of people who actually stood in line for the event was enough to convince you this whole meeting was sham, Frank’s Posterous blogged at 6:05pm, “The attendees see that the ‘Program’ for the meeting is clearly labeled as sponsored by SEIU.” To view the leaflet handed out to promote the event, click the image in the upper left hand corner of this article.

As for the actual meeting itself, Frank Derfler, who also operates Frank’s Posterous, had this to say on 10 Connects.com, a website for a Tampa Bay News station:

The bottom line is that Rep Castor did NOT want to have an interaction with the community.. I was there inside the room.. I listened… IF she had started with some reason and logic, she would have had respectful silence. But, she was there to deliver the administration’s talking points so people from row 4 on back.. (the 1st 3 rows being loaded with union members and supporters) almost immediately tuned her out and began to protest the poor weak message she carried. If you want respect, you need to earn respect. People wanted to be heard, not receive a “talking points” lecture”

Representative Castor apparently left the meeting without ever taking a single question from the crowd. So much for promoting open dialogue!

Be sure to check out the video below that was taken in the parking lot at the location for the event. It stars the ever so courteous SEIU thugs telling opponents to Obama’s health care proposal that they “can’t even read” – because they are backwoods Southern hicks.

CAUGHT IN THE ACT: President Obama Admits His Secret Love, a Single-Payer System

Monday, August 3rd, 2009

As the debate over proposed health care reform legislation heats up during the press from special interests during Congress’s August recess, both experts and citizen journalists dig up archived clips to piece together what they believe are the intents triggering and potential outcomes resulting from the passage of a public option.

This YouTube clip, courtesy of Naked Emperor News, expose President Obama’s deepest feelings regarding health care reform: the elimination of private insurance and a shift to a single-payer system, where citizens join public rolls and receive equal (well, equally as bad) care. 

More and more videos like these are emerging with further evidence likely to be brought up during recess. Liberal Congressional leaders and the President himself are forced to justify their previous statements and hopefully, they won’t have to employ the Oracle at Delphi Robert Gibbs (White House Press Secretary) take care of it for them.

Patient-Physician Relationship Strangely Absent from Debate

Monday, August 3rd, 2009

In the video embedded below, Dr. C.L. Gray, a practicing Board certified internal medicine physician out of western North Carolina who runs the advocacy group Physicians for Reform, discusses the changes that would be implemented under President Obama’s health care reform legislation and the comparisons this plan draws to the Oregon Health Plan.

Specifically, he tells the story of an Oregon woman named Barbara Wagner who was diagnosed with lung cancer in spring 2008. But rather then provide her with the aggressive treatment of Tarceva, a new chemotherapy, her oncologist recommended, the bureaucrats who ran the Oregon Health Plan, a program created in 1994 to give the state’s working poor access to basic health care while limiting costs by ‘prioritizing care’, instead offered her two alternate options – hospice care or physician assisted suicide, both of which would be paid for by the state. In 1997, Oregon passed the Death with Dignity Act, thus legalizing physician assisted suicide so that it could be provided for patients who chose to die without further medical treatment. This combined with the already institutionalized state-run health care system secured the power the government needed to ration health care in order to control its financial risk.

When pressed for a reason why the state of Oregon was withholding treatment Barbara Wagner desperately needed to save her life, both Dr. Walter Shaffer, spokesman for Oregon’s Division of Medical Assistance Programs, and Dr. Som Saha, chairman of the commission that sets policy for the Oregon Health Plan, echoed nearly identical statements in which they said, “We can’t cover everything for everyone. Taxpayer dollars are limited for publicly funded programs. We try to come up with policies that provide the most good for the most people.” And this is just a state-run health care system with a population of a little over three million people. Imagine what it is going to be like with the federal bureaucracy at the helm and a population a hundred times that of Oregon’s!

Dr. C.L. Gray notes in his video, “What is strangely absent from these discussions is any mention of patient-physician relationship.”

Of course what Dr. Gray is saying is nothing new for those who have paid careful attention to the health care debate. We all remember President Obama’s response to Jane Sturm’s question during the ABC News ObamaCare infomercial – on second thought, based on the ratings it’s not likely – on whether his health care reform plan took into account “the spirit or the joy of life” when treating the elderly:

This isn’t to say that Dr. Gray’s reiteration of this precise point is irrelevant. Quite the opposite. As the race heats up to get anything passed, it is imperative that this story keeps being repeated.

Patients First Bus Tour to Keep Pressure on Key Senators During Recess

Thursday, July 30th, 2009

pf-bus-pic-4Key senators in the ongoing healthcare debate wanting to take some time away from the chaotic political fracas Congress finds itself marred in right now and simply relax within each of their own respective home states during the upcoming legislative recess may be in for quite a rude awakening. At least that is what organizers of the Patients First thirteen-state bus tours are hoping will occur.

Patients First, a project of Americans for Prosperity, the nation’s premier grassroots organization committed to advancing every individual’s right to economic freedom and opportunity, is a rallying cry for citizens of this country concerned about the direction in which our health care system is being dragged forcibly toward, a way in which American across the country can organize themselves in order to successfully combat the lobbyists, unions, and politicians in Washington trying to seize control of our health care. “Americans are fired up about health care, and the bus tour gives more people the opportunity to come out and get involved,” said Amy Menefee, spokesperson for Patients First. “They’ve heard enough proposals from Washington that give government all the decision-making power. It is time for citizens to tell their legislators to stop, turn around, and pursue real reforms that put patients first.”

Launched this past Saturday (July 25th) in Richmond, the inaugural Patients First bus is expected to continue its tour through the state of Virginia, making twenty-six stops within that territory alone, and eventually proceeding on to North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Indiana, and Louisiana. The second bus, which begins its tour of duty on Monday, August 3rd, will travel through Nebraska, Colorado, North and South Dakota, Montana, Iowa, Arkansas, and Missouri. Both buses are expected to wrap up their tours on Friday, August 28th. View a map of the Patients First bus tour to locate specific stops on the route.

Constituents at each stop are urged by organizers to call or visit their senators and sign a petition that asks members of Congress to “oppose any legislation that imposes greater government control over my health care that would mean fewer choices for me and my family and even deny treatments to those in need.” The goal of the project is to have 250,000 individuals sign the petition by the time Congress reconvenes. So far 164,882 people have signed it, leaving a little over 85,000 signatures left to go.

“These proposals would change everything about health care as we know it. Instead of patients and doctors making decisions, it would be government bureaucrats,” said Menefee. “We’ve got to let lawmakers know that the American people simply don’t want a government takeover of their health care.”

pf-bus-pic-1  pf-bus-pic-2  pf-bus-pic-3

Have Blue Dog Democrats Sold Out on Health Care?

Wednesday, July 29th, 2009

It never ceases to amaze those in the realm of political discourse how things can change so quickly in so little time. Less than a day after a memo from David L. Cavicke, Republican Chief of Staff for the Committee on Energy and Commerce, was leaked and obtained by Politico in which it was revealed that “Democratic Leadership” had “told Mr. Boehner’s staff that there will be no vote on Health on the Floor before recess and we will leave Friday,” an apparent breakthrough has been made on the Blue Dog Democrat front of the health care reform battle. What this last-minute deal means – a victory for ObamaCare and the Democratic leadership or simple a face-saving rouse – has yet to be seen.

Fox News is reporting that a deal was reached early this morning. The compromise, according to one member of the fiscally conservative Blue Dog Coalition, “would cut the cost of the $1 trillion-plus package by $100 billion” and would “ensure that the proposed government-run insurance program would not be forced on anyone.” In exchange, the floor vote in the House will be put off until after Labor Day when legislators reconvene. Seven Blue Dog Democrats held up passage of the bill within the Committee on Energy and Commerce, the only panel within the House not to pass some form of the president’s health care reform legislation, over growing concerns for the high-cost of the program and the speed at which Democratic leadership was trying to force a vote. Four of those seven Blue Dogs on the committee – Representatives Mike Ross of Arkansas, Baron Hill of Indiana, Zack Space of Ohio, and Bart Gordon of Tennessee – relented and agreed on passage of the bill this morning. This gives Chairman Henry Waxman, representative from California, just enough votes to pass the bill through the committee. It is expected that the committee will meet up this afternoon for mark-up, or finalization, of the bill.

What will happen to President Obama’s health care reform legislation hereafter is anyone’s guess at this point. This is hardly a victory for the White House and the Democratic leadership in Congress, however. There is no physical bill for the president to sign – undoubtedly though he will go out among the masses at his town-hall revivals and proclaim, quite prematurely, “Mission: Accomplished” on ‘meeting’ his August deadline – and there will not be a floor vote on the bill until after Labor Day. At most this ‘deal’ was simply a face-saving maneuver for Obama and Nancy Pelosi going into recess. Still, the choice for the Democrats to take the fight over health care reform in this direction is a double-edged sword for them. Going into recess with nothing would have been hugely embarrassing for the Democrats. Congressional Republicans would have touted this as a victory for their cause and rightfully so. At least with this, they can proclaim that they accomplished something, even if what they eventually did produce lacked any real teeth. No doubt their friends in the mainstream media will gleefully help mask this rouse as a victory for the White House.

But, at the same time, opponents of the president’s legislation have gained a vital opportunity as well. They now have a fixed target date and, quite possibly by the time both houses of Congress break for recess, will have actual legislation to cite. This basically allots them weeks of free-range target practice in which to take pot shots at moderate ‘Blue Dog’ Democrats for not reading the bill. They’ll have plenty of ammo to use. For example, the fact that the $100 billion ‘cut’ from the program is a mere spit in the bucket compared to the overall $900 billion cost.

One has to also take note that while this not be a solid victory for the Democrats, neither is it defeat. The fight is just beginning. Nancy Pelosi still only needs thirteen or fourteen of the fifty-two Blue Dog Democrats to pass the bill on the floor on a razor-thin majority vote.

Rep. Conyers Sees No Need to Read Health Care Bill

Tuesday, July 28th, 2009

Democratic Representative John Conyers of Michigan, speaking at a luncheon sponsored by the National Press Club in Washington D.C. this past Friday, July 24th, questioned what the point was in his Congressional colleagues even bothering to read the one-thousand page health care reform bill the White House is adamantly trying to get passed, at least in one form or another, before the August 7th recess.

Conyers, Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, stated, “I love these members, they get up and say, ‘Read the bill.’ What good is reading the bill if it’s a thousand pages and you don’t have two days and two lawyers to find out what it means after you read the bill?”

CNS News produced the following clip of Representative Conyer’s speech:

Umm, perhaps for the simple reason that you have an obligation toward the people of your state to read a bill before voting on it? The fact that members of Congress don’t read every bill that is ultimately voted upon is nothing new. It has begrudgingly become an accepted reality of American political culture. But for a Congressional member like Conyers who has served as long as he has – he is the second-longest serving incumbent member of the House and the fifth-longest in both houses – to make such a statement in front of members of the press in regards to a bill as controversial as ObamaCare has become is absolutely astonishing. No one would sign a contract without reading it first, so why should federal legislators? One has to question Conyers why, if it takes two lawyers and yourself more then two days to figure out what exactly a bill contains, should you be voting on it in the first place?

[UPDATE] Representative Paul Ryan of Wisconsin on MSNBC explaining why legislators should consider reading the bill before voting on it:

Evden eve nakliyat firmaları ile müşteriler burada buluşuyor, uygun taşımacılık bizde yapılır evden eve nakliyat evden eve nakliyat %100 dogal vpills penis büyütücü gercegin özü penis büyütücü porno burdan izlenir bence sende porno izle bu sitede yada sikiş porno izle bence porno izle bu sitedeporno sikiş sende sikiş sikiş sex ve sex izle bu sitede sex porno burdan izlenir bence sende porno izle bu sitede yada sikiş porno izle bence porno izle bu sitedeporno sikiş sende sikiş sikiş porno gel burda indirporno izle porno film izle burda porno film porno gel izleporno Freepornsexx.com - Free porn, Porn, Free porn tube, Porno, Sikiş, Sex, XXX porn, Sex videos, Hot sex porno Freepornsexx.com - Free porn, Porn, Free porn tube, Porno, Sikiş, Sex, XXX porn, Sex videos, Hot sexporn gel sende porno sikiş burda izle sikiş gel sende porno sikiş burda porno izle porno gel sende porno sikiş burda porno porno izle porno burdan izlenir bence sende porno izle bu sitede yada sikiş porno izle bence porno izle bu sitedeporno sikiş sende sikiş sikiş porno filmleri bu sitede izle sikiş ve porno filmler için en ideal site bu porno izle sitesidir. sikiş sikiş videoları porno sikiş Tüm sikiş filmleri bu site sen nerdesin ? yerli tüm sikiş filmlerini bu sikiş sitesinde izleyin. Diğer sitelerden farklı videolar bu sitede. Sizde porno izleyin. Evden Eve Kayseri denince ilk akla gelen firma olan Kaytaş nakliyat müşterilerine en iyi ve sorunsuz hizmeti sunmaktadır. Kaytaş nakliyat sigortalı olarak yaptığı nakliye işlemini eşyalarınızın taşınması sırasında oluşabilecek sorunlarda sorumluluğu üstüne almaktadır. Kayseri Evden Eve alanında zirve de olan Kaytaş nakliyat yaptığı titiz taşımacılık ile her zaman tercih edilmiş ve edilmeye devam ediyor.Sizde Kaytaş Evden Eve Kayseri ile sorunsuz bir taşıma için iletişime geçin. sohbet sohbet sohbet çocuk oyunları video izle