Articles Tagged ‘Ed Morrissey’

Blogging right reacts to Snowe ‘defection’

Wednesday, October 14th, 2009

Republican (or RINO) Sen. Olympia Snowe (Maine) was the sole GOP vote for the ‘Baucus’ bill to pass committee Tuesday.

Hot Air’s Ed Morrissey points out the flaws in Snowe’s “history calls” parsing of her vote.

History?  Certainly, we don’t often see Congressional committees passing summaries instead of writing legislation, so that’s one for the history books.  We also don’t often see Congress passing trillion-dollar bills in a rush, although to be fair, they managed to do it earlier with Porkulus — a bill on which Snowe also helped make “history”.  Unfortunately, we see Snowe often crossing over on critical votes, so that’s neither history nor a surprise.

Wellsy’s World writes that “there are several major reasons why supporters shouldn’t be too overcome with elation, and why opponents shouldn’t despair:”

The Baucus bill does not exist in legislative language form. What passed today was the summary language translation of the Baucus plan. This is what the CBO scored, and when the legislative language is hammered out, it will most likely add costs and adversely affect the budgetary scoring, to say nothing of provisions in the legislative that may be overlooked in the summary form but have hidden consequences for the public.

Perhaps that’s why democratic leadership won’t allow the full text to be published.

“What this all means is that it’s unlikely the Baucus bill will survive in a significant manner under assaults from the liberal wing of the Democratic Party and under spending and taxation concerns from conservatives,” Wellsy adds.

The Weekly Standard had this statement from Republican leader Mitch McConnell, of Kentucky:

The fact is, this proposal will never come before the Senate. But what we do know is that the bill written behind closed doors here in the Capitol will be another 1,000-page, trillion-dollar Washington takeover. We know it will slash a half-trillion dollars from seniors’ Medicare, add new taxes and raise premiums. That’s not reform.

Even Joe Lieberman had criticism for the Baucus bill - salient statements begin around 3:35.

Calls to action:

Gateway Pundit urged their readers to “contact these senators and insist that Americans get a chance to see the full text of the bill before any vote is taken on any so-called health care bill.

“Americans insist:

“Show us the bill!”

… and even provides contact information so readers can “melt the phones.”

RedState’s Erik Erikson goes a step further, asking readers to mail Snowe a bag of rock salt.

Olympia Snowe has sold out the country. Having been banished to our world after Aslan chased her out of Narnia, Snowe is intent on corrupting this place too.

So we should melt her.

What melts snow? Rock salt.

I’m going to ship this 5 pound bag of rock salt to her office in Maine. It’s only $3.00. You should join me.

It is a visible demonstration of our contempt for her. First she votes for the stimulus. Now this.

While Neo Neocon writes, “Snowe certainly gave the bill a nice push by giving Obama the cover he needs to claim a spurious bipartisanship. If there’s anything this bill is not, it’s bipartisan.”

But since Congressional leadership refuses to publish the text of the Baucus bill or require any bill be published before a vote, perhaps the media can publish these comments by liberal economist Robert Reich and pass it as the bill.

NewsBusters P.J. Gladnick reports on the Reich Speech as proof that the
Democrats’ health care plan is for you to “die quickly.”

NYT poll ‘dishonest to the extreme’ critics say

Friday, September 25th, 2009

The premise of the New York Times/CBS poll results isn’t positive: Barack Obama is losing ground on both Afghanistan and health care reform, and people are confused about the latter.

That’s before you take into account the Times’ sugar-coating the issue with some questionable polling samples.

But first, these excerpts:

Majorities of respondents said that they were confused about the health care argument and that Mr. Obama had not done a good job in explaining what he was trying to accomplish.

“The Obama administration seems to have a plan, but I’m not understanding the exact details,” Paul Corkery, 59, a Democrat from Somerset, N.J., said in a follow-up interview.

76 percent said Republicans had not even laid out a clear health care plan

Taken together, the poll reflects the crosscurrents buffeting the president on every major issue. Americans still trust Mr. Obama and seem willing to follow him, particularly in contrast to Republicans. But he is not quite the commanding figure he was in the spring, and his policies do not enjoy the support they once did.

Hot Air’s Ed Morrissey called the poll “dishonest to the extreme” and advised “Obama should take no satisfaction in these poll results.”

His approval ratings remain relatively high, but that has more to do with the sample, which has become an absolute embarrassment in political polling.

The party split in the sample has Republicans at 22%, Democrats at 37%, and independents at 33%.  That would make sense — if Barack Obama had won the presidential election by 20 points last November.  Since Obama won by seven points, with strong support from independents and some crossover Republicans, the notion of a 15-point gap in party affiliation was ludicrous then, and is even more ludicrous now.  Their July sample had a 14-point gap, which means the pollsters must feel that Democrats have gained ground over the last two months.

The Weekly Standard’s blog suggests some of the confusion may be benefiting the president - at least until more details are made public.

The Democrats are right to worry that any serious scrutiny of the bill could scuttle the whole project. Every provision that has received real scrutiny — the “end of life counseling,” courtesy of Sarah Palin, and the loop holes for illegal immigrants, courtesy of Joe Wilson — has been quickly dumped. The public option will probably be dumped tomorrow. Would co-ops survive a real public debate? Not likely.

Dogs and cats living together: Conservatives heart Stewart after ACORN monologue

Saturday, September 19th, 2009

Could it be the right wing media is happy with a Jon Stewart monologue?

Could it be the “liberal” Jon Stewart, who closed his season with a no-holds-barred slam-fest against Fox News coverage of government protesters is praising Michelle Malkin?

Okay, so Stewart can’t bring himself to openly say something positive about Malkin, but he clearly swings out against the mainstream media for completely missing the boat on the ACORN prostitution sting videos.

“I’m a fake journalist and I’m embarrassed these guys scooped me,” the entertainer says (5:36) about the ACORN videos’ producers James OKeefe and Hannah Giles. “You don’t have to tell people you’re a white guy. Your pimp outfit is a chinchilla coat over your Andover uniform.” (5:02)

The Daily Show With Jon Stewart Mon - Thurs 11p / 10c
The Audacity of Hos
www.thedailyshow.com
Daily Show
Full Episodes
Political Humor Healthcare Protests

While O’Keefe and Giles travel the country, stinging ACORN offices in Baltimiore, DC, New York and San Diego, the government is cancelling grants and Census contracts, the media is playing catch-up to newbie site BigGovernment.com that funded the nationwide undercover investigation with $3,000.

Even Hot Air’s Ed Morrissey has something positive to say about Stewart.

Kudos to Jon Stewart, who doesn’t sugar-coat the embarrassment at all. … How can the national news media ignore the many allegations of corruption at ACORN, which gets millions of dollars in federal funding, and allow a couple of independents with $3,000 and a bad wardrobe scoop them on the undercover story of the year? It’s easy when newsrooms are more concerned with political direction than truth. Stick around to the end, when Stewart zings Michelle Malkin haters.

“Strange bedfellows this day makes. I can’t imagine what 2012 will bring,” Mojave Mark commented on Morrissey’s page.

Mike Flynn, editor-in-chief of BigGovernment.com told the right-wing news site Human Events.com that more O’Keefe videos are coming, so it’s likely the pressure against ACORN will continue to mount.

Are you a Democratic legislator in a Republican-leaning seat?” Moe Lane asks in his latest post.

Because if you are, here is an advisory: as of this moment, if the Right catches you or your staff within 100 yards of an ACORN office or worker we will cheerfully crucify you with that organization. And by ‘crucify’ I mean “take the metaphorical and rhetorical equivalent of long iron nails and permanently attach you to ACORN with them.”

Radio personalities Don Wade and Roma from WLS AM in Chicago interviewed ABC News Anchor Charlie Gibson about the ACORN video scandal and got this clip:

Don: Okay, here’s my news question. A Senate bill yesterday passes, cutting off funds to this group called ACORN. Now, we got that bill passed and we have the embarrassing video of ACORN staffers giving tax advice on how to set up a brothel with 13-year-old hookers. It has everything you could want – corruption and sleazy action at tax-funded organizations and it’s got government ties. But nobody’s covering that story. Why?

Gibson: HAHAHAHAHA. I didn’t even know about it. Um. So, you’ve got me at a loss. I don’t know. Uh. Uh. But my goodness, if it’s got everything including sleaziness in it, we should talk about it this morning.

You can catch the audio at Michelle Malkin’s ACORN Watch: Charlie Gibson and the ostrich media post.

Harder edge, still vague

Wednesday, September 9th, 2009

President Barack Obama pleased supporters with more of what he’s good at, fiery campaign rhetoric and a firmer-than-usual stance on health care reform.

However, he’s sure to disappoint with little direction or clarity on the biggest stumbling block for the Democratic caucus: the public option.

How did the blogosphere react?

“Barack Obama is a terrific salesman with a bad product,” said HotAir’s Ed Morrissey in his post-speech broadcast. “I think in the end, the Kennedy thing is really going to not work for him. I think that whole sad story at the end of the speech was a downer.”

Blogger DDay reacted positively to the “Spark of Life” in his speech, “I will say that there’s a bit of a harder edge in these remarks, particularly toward out-and-out opponents of reform, the likes of which have disrupted town halls all last month. This follows the fiestiness of Obama’s Labor Day speech to the AFL-CIO.”

Jonathan Cohn, blogging for The New Republic says, “Looks like there’s some news in the speech after all.  Quite a bit.

“On the policy front, President Obama tonight endorses, clearly and unambiguously, a requirement that everybody obtain insurance–that is, an individual mandate. He has not done that before, not this explicitly.”

The newsworthiness of Obama’s noncommittal defense of the public option is questionable, but Cohn also points out, “he also comes down hard–very hard–on opponents who are merely out to defeat reform.”

The Neo Neocon, who might fall under that category, points out some serious flaws in Obama’s tough-guy stance:

(3) He offers still another reiteration of the fact that if you have private health insurance now, you won’t lose it. It will only get better. But he doesn’t answer critics who offer reasons why this is unlikely to be so.

(4) For the uninsured, there will be an insurance exchange. This particular exchange is a nebulous, poorly-explained, and poorly understood entity in terms of how it would actually work. But I am willing to bet that it won’t work … the way it works for members of Congress.

And as for the deficit neutrality? She has this to say: “Of course, it’s technically true that “our deficit will grow” if we do nothing—thanks to Obama. But even the CBO has said that, if the present health care plan is passed, it will make the deficit grow even more.”

Leftie blogger Mahablog shows the danger in blind following: “Not one dime to deficit. OK.”

Because Obama says it’s so, it must be.  many of the blogger’s comments follow a similar strain.

And the Bhuddist’s take on the Boustany rebuttal? “No insurance across state lines. It’s a scam.”

Thanks for all that backing logic.

And the usually loquacious leftie blog Hullabaloo has one quick post-speech post, by tristero - The Whole Point.

picture-41

The right, on the other hand, picked up on South Carolina Rep. Joe Wilson shouted “LIAR!” on Obama’s assertion that illegal immigrants won’t be covered.

Biden shakes his head, Pelosi stares gape-mouthed and Obama stops mid-stride.

Biden shakes his head, Pelosi stares gape-mouthed and Obama stops mid-stride.

Within minutes, the footage excerpt was up on Allahpundit and Gateway Pundit, who also pointed out the back and forth between the president and Sarah Palin on “death panels”.

Disrupting the disruptor - NH Cong. cannot take her own medicine

Monday, August 31st, 2009

Cong. Carol Shea-Porter (D-NH) had an anti-reform protester arrested at her town hall meeting for challenging the presence of uniformed SEIU representatives in the audience, leading many to suggest she has lost touch with the public that elected her.

Hot Air blogger Ed Morrissey says, “I’ve watched this video a couple of times, and I still can’t figure out why the police took this man out of the room.”

Now Hampshire has a telling description of Porter’s own roots as a “rabble-rousing, town hall disrupting anti-war activist.”

In four short years Carol Shea-Porter has evolved from a rabble-rousing, town hall disrupting anti-war activist who once had to be forcibly removed from a President George Bush event in Portsmouth to a Member of Congress who instructed armed security guards to remove a frustrated voter from her own town hall event in Manchester on Saturday.

In the appended video, Shea-Porter can be seen instructing security to remove a man for standing to ask a question without a ticket. Shea-Porter previously held a lottery to determine who could ask questions. She can also be heard taunting the man on his way out by saying, “I do hope the movie theater can be a little quieter for you.”

Now Hampshire reports that Porter is becoming “unhinged” by the protests in her district, to the point where her lack of town hall meetings has become a topic of discussion on NH Political Report.

“The irony is, of course, that Shea-Porter used to be a ‘tea-bagger’ on the left,” writes Nashua Telegraph columnist Kevin Landrigan. “She stalked then-congressman Jeb Bradley at town hall-style meetings the 1st District Republican incumbent held throughout his district.”

“Everybody standing here is a patriot,” Shea-Porter said at a Real ID protest that featured people in Nazi uniforms goose stepping at a “checkpoint” in 2006.

Shea-Porter’s debut in the above video appears at 3:35, but there’s colorful footage before that.

“But that was when she was one of the hoi polloi,” Morrissey concludes. “Now, she’s in power, and Shea-Porter doesn’t deign to take questions without preselecting who can speak in her presence.  And that’s a re-election strategy that is both all too familiar and increasing unlikely to succeed in 2010.”

Who’s the Biggest Godwin Offender - Perhaps, LaRouche?

Thursday, August 13th, 2009

Can we as a nation please stop with the Nazi/Hitler insults?

Seriously.

People speaking their minds at public forums are suddenly jack-booted Nazi thugs? (Forget that they are carrying anti-nazi slogans - or forget the implication they are comparing reformers to Nazis, depending on your political stripe.)

An African American member of Congress has a swastika painted over his Senate emblem?

Obama = Hitler?

Fictional death panels?

Are we really, as a nation, so devoid of anything productive to say to one another about health care reform that it’s just down to a contest about how often we can bring up the Nazi holocaust.

Unless we’re talking about the copy of Mein Kampf up for auction in the UK, or the German high court’s ruling on Nazi symbols, there is no excuse.

I hearby invoke Godwins Law and propose a national backlash against anybody making spurious references to their opponents as neo-fascist Nazis or Hitler, and will chronicle the worst offenders here.

Forget about the pundits - the shock jocks paid to enrage - Rush limbaugh has already been declared the “big fat loser” (can we please stop attacking people’s personal, physical characteristics while we’re at it?) in a Chicago Tribune editorial.

We’re just going to focus on the news media.

Conservative Hot Air’s Allahpundit uses it ironically to describe the other side’s description of anti-reform protesters.  But is it even necessary there?

Either indies have suddenly developed a taste for Nazi mobs of political terrorists or the Democrats’ message war on ObamaCare opponents is a rather epic fail.

Already the backlash has begun.  American Jewish groups and the Anti-Defamation league cry “enough is enough.”

But that doesn’t necessarily mean they agree on which side is the most egregious in abusing the Nazi analogy.

In Jewish Groups Argue Over Nazi Analogies, Washington Post reporter Jacqueline L. Salmon points out there is a lot of blame to spread around.

Rush Limbaugh’s recent remarks comparing Democrats to Nazis has drawn widespread condemnation among Jewish groups, but has also triggered a fight among them over which party is abusing the Nazi analogy.

Limbaugh was commenting on House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s assertion that some protesters at town meetings bore swastika signs. Limbaugh said similarities between the Obama health-care logo and the Nazi logo were “overwhelming.” He then drew comparisons between the Democratic party and the Nazi party.

But some Republican Jewish groups, who also criticized the remarks, went after Washington Rep. Brian Baird, a Democrat, who last week decried what he called “brown-shirt tactics” by health-care reform opponents.

Post colleague Dan Eggen ignores the brown-shirt reference by Baird to focus on Limbaugh, Glen Beck and the anti-reform protesters wielding swastikas, including “a toddler in a stroller was photographed holding a sign featuring a crossed-out swastika and the slogan: ‘Say No to Fascism!’ ”

The comparisons appear to stem in part from erroneous claims by opponents, including some Republican lawmakers, that a House health-care reform bill would lead to euthanasia for the elderly.

Eggen ignores Democratic excesses, focusing on the opposition’s abuse of the analogy, quoting DNC spokesman Hari Sevugan without any counter-point.

“The repeated use of Nazi symbolism at community meetings by the Republican-incited mob proves that these protests have nothing to do with health care, but rather that the Republican Party is willing to sink to the lowest, most despicable levels to accomplish their goal of ‘breaking’ President Obama,” Sevugan said.

One commendation goes to National Headlines Examiner Charisse Van Horn for debunking the Obama-Hitler references on the grounds of his civil rights awards given out yesterday.

Lyndon who?
Conservative bloggers Ed Morrissey and John McCormac point to another major offender: the disgraced party of Lyndon LaRouche.

McCormac claims LaRouchies are responsible for the Obama/Hitler references.

To put it mildly, comparing your political opponents in America to Nazis is inappropriate–no matter if the comparison is made by Pelosi or left-wing talker Bill Press or Rush Limbaugh (in response to Pelosi’s “swastikas” statement) or Andrew Sullivan who routinely compares those who support harsh interrogations of al Qaeda members to the Gestapo.

Not necessarily.

Non-LaRouche protester

Non-LaRouche protester

Washington Independent writer David Weigel points out that not all the Obama-Hitler references belong to the LaRouche camp.

Unfortunately, as NewsBusters writer Seton Motley points out, many news organizations have run the LaRouche posters as color for pieces criticizing Limbaugh and other Conservatives.

Apparently “the enemy of my enemy is my friend” doesn’t hold water in this case, Motley notes, as LaRouche is explicitly calling for an extreme, single-payer solution.

Reacting to the ‘mob’

Wednesday, August 12th, 2009

The party in power is held to a higher standard than the opposition. By the same token, those holding town hall meetings are held to a higher standard of decorum than those who attend.

How representatives handle protests at their town hall forums tells a lot about their leadership skill, and how the media reacts to the growing dissent tells a lot about their bias.

In Arlen Specter faces fury: ‘You work for us!’ Politico’s Andy Barr gives Democrat Specter mixed reviews for his performance.

Specter (D-Pa.) fired back Tuesday at a raucous town hall audience that booed and jeered him for more than an hour.

Specter immediately tried to temper the rough crowd, which started booing him before the question-and-answer session even began, with the blunt warning: “If you want to stay in here, we’re not going to tolerate any demonstrations or booing. So, it’s up to you.”

But Specter’s assertion that he was not required to attend the town hall was not received so well.

“You work for us!” shouted several members of the crowd. “You work for us!”

Hot Air Blogger Ed Morrissey had a clever twist on the exchange, “He then angered the crowd all over again by reminding them how lucky they are to be in his presence at all.”

Morrissey took exception to the Senator’s lament that he didn’t get any extra pay for holding town hall meetings to get yelled at.

He makes $174,000 a year for a job that requires him to be at the office four days a week when Congress is in session, which is only about 2/3rds of the year. He has a gold-plated medical and dental package that Specter certainly won’t surrender for the ObamaCare system he’s pushing. Thanks to his 30 years in the Senate, he’s eligible for a pension that will pay 80% of that salary and keep his benefits package in place until he dies.

How many of his constituents have that kind of job? How many do you think will be impressed that Specter deigned to receive his subjects without getting a bonus payment to do it? What a great example of Beltway arrogance.

The New Republic’s Michael Crowley heaped praise on Claire McCaskill’s handling of town hall disruptions.

She was pitch-perfect: polite and responsive without being a pushover, armed with clear and compelling facts (emphasis on things any health reform bill will *not* do) and firm when necessary. She shamed one of the loudest hecklers by reminding him that “we have good manners in Missouri,” but without losing her own temper.

Blogger Matthew Yglesias asks the question many liberals are probably feeling:

I don’t understand why members of congress are holding these town halls. There’s been so much focus on the spectacle of the whole thing that nobody’s really stepped back and explained what the purpose of these events are other than to give us pundits something to chat about.

Pennsylvania Gov. Ed Rendell took a new tack in painting the health care opposition with the birther label.

Rendell, a Democrat, told Politico’s Barr that “much of the outrage being demonstrated at town halls across the country comes from so-called birthers, whom he described as ‘absolutely nuts’.”

“I’ve never seen ugliness and rage like this in all my years in office,” the two-term governor and former Philadelphia mayor said.

While birthers are a small fraction of the opposition, both Specter and McCaskill were shouted down by audience members who questioned the president’s natural born citizen credentials, and the issue has nearly derailed most town hall meetings on health care reform.

It’s feeding frenzy time in the Blogosphere

Friday, July 10th, 2009

There is blood in the water - Democrats are hesitating, the healthcare reform express has stalled just out of the station, and bloggers on both sides of the fence are circling.

“The news from pollsters and constituents look pretty bad for Democrats looking towards a midterm election in the middle of a deep recession and escalating unemployment,” says Hot Air blogger Ed Morrissey.

Dan Riehl’s Riehl World View heaped scorn on the democrats:

What’s more costly, that our Democrat government is inept, or health care reform? Unfortunately, they are one and the same. Already behind schedule, they’ve suddenly realized they may actually have to figure out how to pay for it. I realize that’s all but unheard of in Washington these days, but geesh. If they think they are going to change everyone in America’s health care and a huge portion of the nation’s GDP with some last minute, too important to read BS, they are going to be thrown out in droves come 2010. Unfortunately, for the Democrat majority, at least, that may already be inevitable. Still, they are intent on making it worse. I won’t be sorry to see them go.

Punk Patriot’s rant on why we have to “watch what’s happening on the Hill” took aim at the Democrats’ “corporate welfare” healthcare reform measures as well as Republican fears of socialism on Dandelion Salad.

Josh Greenman, writing in the New York Daily News opinion section, takes Obama to task for not providing enough detail - the president’s pledge to let Congress develop a consensus.
“This is like a car salesman who tells you everything that’s wrong with the clunker you currently drive without letting you take the vehicle he’s trying to sell you around the block for a spin.
“But why trade up when you may wind up with a broken-down jalopy, especially when it’s going to cost you an arm and a leg up-front?”

Read more: