Articles Tagged ‘CBS News’

Enjoy it while it lasts - top reasons Obama’s polling success won’t last

Friday, September 11th, 2009

A CNN snap poll from after Wednesday’s speech looked rosy, showing that viewers increased in their support for Obama’s proposals, from 53% up to 67%.

That’s before you consider CNN totally oversampled Democrats who support reform in the first place.

The problem is way more Democrats watched the speech than Republicans - as if the above numbers wouldn’t tell you that. Compared to the general population Democrats made up 45%, Republicans 18%, and the rest were independent.

“Those [gains] are almost identical to a poll conducted immediately after Bill Clinton’s health care speech before Congress in September, 1993.”

And we all know how that turned out.

CBS Poll

CBS Poll

CBS News hopes their poll will be more credible, showing a more modest 12 percent gain, but most people don’t think reform will help them (or really understand “Obama’s Plan”).

The poll shows Americans now give him the “best marks of his presidency on handling health care,” but people still aren’t sure what his “plan” entails. Only 22 percent said the reforms now being considered would help them personally.

Thursday, CBS re-interviewed 678 adults first questioned August 27-31.

Last week, just 40 percent of these adults approved of how the president was handling health care. More, 47 percent, disapproved. After the speech, 52 percent said they approved and only 38 percent said they disapproved. Those are the best assessments for Mr. Obama’s handling of health care shown all year by CBS News Polls.

CBS Poll

CBS Poll

The re-poll reached 648 of the 678 original respondents and CBS claims the original margin of error at plus or minus 4 percent. “While the error for subgroups is higher, the error on measures of individual change is smaller.”

Based on that poll, Salon.com is caling President Obama’s address to Congress, “mostly, a winner.”

Not so fast.

Politico blogger Glenn Thrush pointed out that Americans are skeptical of polls, however, after the CNN post-speech poll “skewed Democrat.”

One other critical detail I should have added — Obama’s coattails are microscopic: When asked if the bills floating through Congress would help or hurt, 22% said help, 27% said hurt and a whopping 47% said it would have no effect. Those stats are slightly better than a week before but virtually unchanged.

The huge number of undecideds-unsures-pursuadables underscores what the Gallup survey released earlier this week showed, that when it comes to public opinion health care reform — despite all the hype and vitriol — is still basically a jump ball.

Democracy Corps‘ dial-tested focus group of debate-watchers in Denver, Colo. focused on evenly devided swing voters who sided 54 to 46 percent between Obama and John McCain in the 2008 election.

These voters’ support and opposition of the health care plan went from 46 percent for and 46 percent against before the speech, to 66 to 30 percent afterward. In addition, before the speech only 44 percent described the plan as “the right kind of change,” with 52 percent saying it was not. That number then shifted to 50 to 40 percent after the speech.

A Rasmussen survey found only 2 percent increase in support for the Democrats’ health care reform proposal - up to 46 percent since the two days before Obama’s speech.

RealClearPolitics’ Kyle Trygstad points out that, “The speech appears to have had more of an impact on Democrats, though, as Rasmussen reports that the boost comes “entirely from those in the president’s own party.”

“Enjoy it while it lasts, champ, because no one — including liberal Democrats — thinks it will,” writes Hot Air’s Allahpundit.

The One’s struggling just to pull a bare majority. Soon liberals and moderates will start freaking out anew over the public option and then the erosion will begin again. The only thing he can do now to keep Democrats from tearing each other’s throats out is to give them some Republican throats to tear at instead, which, as Karl noted yesterday, is why his speech was so partisan and why the media will continue to wet itself over Joe Wilson for as long as it can.

Did Joe Wilson upstage the president?

Thursday, September 10th, 2009

Numerous boos, heckling by South Carolina Cong. Joe Wilson, and other reactions gave viewers a lot to watch during last night’s address by the president to a joint session of Congress.

12:21 p.m. Thurs. Sept. 9

But how effective was the rallying cry?

Twitter shows Joe Wilson is still leading the trending topics. Obama is nowhere to be found, though President is about halfway down the list.

We’re still waiting for the comprehensive numbers, but TV by the Numbers blogger Robert Seidman gives us a sneak peak as well as some good context.

President Obama’s Health Care speech had a combined 13.2 rating in the early metered markets across NBC (5.5), ABC (4.7) and CBS (3.0).  One ratings point = 1% of the television homes.  These numbers do not include the viewing on other networks or any of the cable news networks.  We expect we will have a full accounting of viewership for Obama’s address this afternoon.  In the meanwhile you can check out the combined viewership numbers (across all networks) for President Obama’s previous press conferences.

ratings

The “Health Care Press Conference” was his summer ABC infomercial - not Wednesday’s joint address to Congress.

Politico’s Ben Smith observed early that “Obama stumps America” with the use of the word demagoguery in his speech - that sent people running to the Google to find out what he meant.

The number one search on Google a bit earlier this evening: “Demagoguery.”

Obama used the word: “In fact, I want to speak directly to America’s seniors for a moment, because Medicare is another issue that’s been subjected to demagoguery and distortion during the course of this debate.”

Tells you something. I’m just not sure what.

(”Joe Wilson” has now supplanted as the top search.)

CBS News’s Steve Chaggaris points out that the speech created more questions than answers.

The big question, however: did the president’s speech work? Are Democrats now unified? Will moderate Republicans jump on board? Are Americans’ concerns quelled and are their questions answered? Did Americans even watch or is there a sort of health care reform fatigue?

Steve also gives us a slew of links to the news coverage of his speech.

Washington Post’s Shailagh Murray and Paul Kane, “Congress Gets Nudge Down a Long Road

New York Times’ Robert Pear and Jackie Calmes, “Obama’s Plan Builds on Others’ Ideas

Associated Press’ Jennifer Loven, “Obama willing to deep-six public option

Politico’s Patrick O’Connor and Glenn Thrush, “Can Nancy Pelosi, Steny Hoyer keep lid on public-option tensions?

Los Angeles Times’ James Oliphant and Tom Hamburger, “Obama says he will weigh medical malpractice reform

Politico’s Carrie Budoff Brown, “Barack Obama’s health-care speech: What he said, what he meant

Associated Press’ Calvin Woodward and Erica Werner, “FACT CHECK: Obama uses iffy math on deficit pledge

Washington Post, “FACT CHECKER

Boston Globe, “Obama’s speech invokes letter from Kennedy

Pro-lifers preparing for fight on healthcare reform. Obama not ready to take on abortion issue.

Wednesday, July 22nd, 2009

HealthcareHorserace.com has been closely following a behind-the-scenes battle over the inclusion of an undeclared abortion mandate in healthcare reform bills proposed in the House and Senate. With the House bill stalled in the Energy and Commerce Committee and multiple amendments aimed at denying federal funding for abortions failing in the Senate last week, pro-life advocates believe that now is the time to go public and make their voices heard on the issue.

“Momentum is picking up. 20 pro-life Democrats have a sent a letter to Pelosi saying they will not support a healthcare bill that includes taxpayer-funded abortion in it and this past weekend the Congressional Budget Office director said that mandating abortion coverage and tax-payer funding cannot be ruled out yet.” (David Beriet of 40 Days for Life, as told to Life News.)

Pro-lifers are organizing a Thursday (July 23) webcast featuring some heavy hitters in the abortion debate -  led by Focus on the Family’s James Dobson, Governor Mike Huckabee and Kristen Day of Democrats for Life. Organizers expect as many as 100,000 to sign on to the Stop the Abortion Mandate seminar and learn more about what they can do to support efforts in Congress to add amendments denying public funding for abortions to the healthcare reform bills currently circulating on Capitol Hill.

Attempting to diffuse the situation, five House Democrats - led by Congressman Tim Ryan - proposed a solution to Speaker Nancy Pelosi yesterday afternoon.

[W]e believe that a common ground solution is to include language in the final legislation that makes clear that no insurance company will be required to pay for an abortion except in extraordinary circumstances — nor will they be prohibited from paying for an abortion, so long as health insurance plans offered in the exchange that choose to provide abortion coverage pay for those services with funds that are separate and distinct from any federal subsidies.

This solution maintains the current status quo in the private market – where insurance companies can choose whether to include this coverage in their plans and individuals can choose which plan (and what sort of coverage) fits their individual needs and values while ensuring that no federal funds are used to pay for abortions.

The Ryan proposal comes a month after he and 19 other House Democrats sent a letter to Speaker Pelosi last month expressing their concern over federal funding for abortions and threatening to vote against any House reform bill that does not include explicit language assuring that federal funds will not be used to pay for abortions.

The pressure may already be paying off as Senate Finance Committee chairman Max Baucus appears to have gotten the message.

“Health care reform is not about that issue at all,” Baucus, D-Mont., said Tuesday. He said the Senate plan would be “neutral — status quo.” (Associated Press)

For his part, President Obama also seems resigned to the status quo a little more than a week removed from an audience with the Pope in the Vatican during which he promised to work to reduce the number of abortions in America.

What I think is important, at this stage, is not trying to micromanage what benefits are covered. Because I think we’re still trying to get a framework. And my main focus is making sure that people have the options of high quality care at the lowest possible price.

As you know, I’m pro choice. But I think we also have a tradition of, in this town, historically, of not financing abortions as part of government funded health care. Rather than wade into that issue at this point, I think that it’s appropriate for us to figure out how to just deliver on the cost savings, and not get distracted by the abortion debate at this station. (President Barack Obama during an interview with CBS News’ Katie Couric.)

The status quo referred to by Baucus and Obama is the 33-year-old Hyde Amendment which forbids Medicaid (and by precedent the federal government) from paying for abortions with federal money. All but 17 states have since followed suit and banned the use of state funds for abortion procedures with 13 of those requiring a court order to do so.