Articles Tagged ‘Blue Dog’

Buying this blue dog: A sound investment

Tuesday, September 22nd, 2009

Overpaying for a small-town Arkansas pharmacy:

$222,000

Overpaying for the pharmacy inventory:

$500,000

Paying off the owner to “not compete”:

$100,000

Owning a key Blue Dog Democrat two years before health care reform threatens your way of life:

Priceless

ProPublica/Politico reporter Marcus Stern reports that Arkansas Rep. Mike Ross was paid off between $1 million to $1.67 million for his pharmacy in Prescott, Ark., in 2007.

“You can buy half the town for $420,000″ - the base value USA Drug paid Ross for the building alone - Adam Guthrie, chairman of the county Board of Equalization, told ProPublica.

Guthrie appraised the property and building at $198,000.

Furthermore, two weeks after the sale of Holly’s Health Mart, USA Drug owner Stephen LaFrance contributed $2,300 to Ross’ campaign, ProPublica and Politico report.

The liberal media, including FiredogLake’s Jane Hamsher are turning the scandal into an argument for the public option, which Ross opposes “because his constituents don’t want one.”

But equally liberal Daily Kos/Research 2000 conducted a poll showing 74 to 80 percent support for the public option.

But the real payola is what Ross is fighting to get in the health care reform bill, according to Hamsher’s report.

He bragged about holding the health care bill “hostage.”

He offered up the same co-op plan in the House that appeared in the Baucus Senate bill — authored by a former Wellpoint executive.

He was one of 5 members of Congress who received a total of $2.5 million in advertising support from PhRMA.

A week later he signed a letter asking that pharmaceutical manufacturers not have to negotiate for drug prices, per a sweetheart deal they negotiated with the White House.

ProPublica’s Stern highlighted the bacon Ross has brought home for his PhRMA “constituents.”

On Aug. 1, the National Community Pharmacist Association issued a news release thanking Ross for an amendment to the health care reform bill that would create greater transparency in the operations of pharmacy benefit managers, who act as clearinghouses for insurance company reimbursements for pharmaceuticals.

In June the National Association of Chain Drug Stores issued a news release thanking Ross for introducing legislation authorizing payments to pharmacists to train patients in how to manage their medications.

Open Secrets did a little more digging:

  • In 2007, Ross was worth between $782,018 and $1.8 million and listed a few health-related assets on his personal financial disclosure forms. This includes between $500,001 and $1 million invested in Ross Pharmacy.
  • Ross has collected $992,500 from the health care sector since he was elected in 2000, making it his second largest contributing sector, after labor.
  • Among Blue Dogs, Ross ranks No. 3 in contributions from the health sector to his candidate committee and leadership PAC and No. 9 in donations from pharmaceutical and health product companies.
  • At $602,800, health care professionals have given more to Ross’ candidate committees than any other industry since the 2000 election cycle.
  • Ross’ former chief of staff, Drew Goesl, is now a principal for Capitol Counsel, which lobbies for pharmaceutical companies Amgen and AstraZeneca PLC and industry trade group Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (better known as PhRMA), among other health-related companies.
  • LaFrance has given largely to Republicans over the years. At least two other Democrats, in addition to Ross, have collected money from LaFrance, and both are senators from Arkansas: Sens. Blanche Lincoln and Mark Pryor.

Blogger Prairie Weather called for reform of the way Congress does business in Blue dog swallows happy cookie.

“One Democratic blue dog is now an official member of the Shameless Party, the third party which has come to dominate Congress,” Prairie Weather wrote. “Oh, okay. He disclosed it in those disclosure reports. That makes it okay, right in line with what Congress demands of its members. Maybe it’s time to do something about that process?”

Obama: “They Can’t Stop Us!”

Monday, September 14th, 2009

At a pro-government controlled health care rally in Minnesota this past Saturday, President Obama told the crowd, “They can’t stop us, Minnesota! Let’s go get this thing done!”

Wow! There is so much one can say in regards to this little statement that it is quite difficult to figure out where to begin exactly. Frankly, at this point in Barack Obama’s presidency, it has already become a cliché to see him throw his campaign promise of bi-partisan cooperation in Congress and to work with both sides of the American political spectrum to solve this country’s major problems. What’s funny (and sad) about that is the fact that he has only been in office a little under nine months.

There is also the question of what exactly the president means when he mentions that ‘they’ cannot stop the government takeover of the health care industry. Who is ‘they’? It is not just Republicans opposing the president’s public-option health care reform proposal, but members of his own party as well. Granted, some of those Blue Dog Democrats are not objecting to it so much out of the goodness of their heart or because they actually care about their constituents. More likely, it is out of a sense of self-preservation. It doesn’t matter though. What matters, however, is that the voices of the American people are being heard.

This is the real Barack Obama. This is not the façade who promises bi-partisanship and cooperation. This is the man who knows he and his party won the majority in both houses of Congress. And while Obama won by only four percentage points in the popular vote in the presidential election, he believes too naively that he has a far larger mandate and far more political capital to spend then he ever actually did have. Though poll numbers did increase slightly in regards to American support for his health care bill following the president’s joint-session of Congress, it mainly demonstrated the televised speech served to shore up, if only temporarily, support among his fellow progressives.Examining his presidential approval numbers closely, you will notice the animosity among Republicans and the sense of dread within independent circles. His behavior, as he demonstrates perfectly during this rally, will only continue to further alienate those two groups.

‘Dropping’ of Public-Option Draws Ire of Far-Left Blogosphere

Tuesday, August 18th, 2009

All of Sunday, the political blogosphere was alight with activity stemming from the titillating rumor circulating around the Washington Beltway that the White House was willing to drop public-option from President Obama’s health care reform proposal. The Drudge Report accompanied the headline with an image of a white flag. Politico led off with the caption, “White House has backedway.” Others, particularly those on the right, aren’t so convinced. Conservative bloggers like Michelle Malkin are skeptical, believing this not to be a retreat by the Obama administration, but rather a “trial balloon [in which] to measure the potential nutroots backlash versus the potential Senate pick-ups.”

In terms of a ‘potential nutroots backlash’ from the far-left side of the political blogosphere, the results so far have to be less then encouraging for the White House. Doug Ross @ Journal examined one blog in particular, America Blog, which seemed to suggest the fight over health care reform was either public-option or bust.

Contributor Joe Sudbay had these words to say:

“I don’t understand why Democrats are always so willing and desperate to compromise with themselves. The GOPers don’t want any reform bill. Their base, comprised of the teabaggers, birthers and deathers, won’t let them negotiate. So, Democrats compromise with themselves, again — and sell out their principles, again. Just like they did on the stimulus package - they gave the GOP nearly 40% of the package in tax cuts, and how many votes did it get them in the entire Congress? Three”

Ahem, excuse me? The ‘Democrats’ are the ones who are “always so willing and desperate to compromise with themselves?” Surely he must be joking. No, he isn’t … but you can still call him Shirley if you like. But in all seriousness how could Joe Sudbay have written this statement with a straight face? So far in the health care debate this summer we have seen the White House tell supporters of the president’s health care proposal – in particular ACORN and SEIU – to ‘punch back twice as hard’ against tea party protestors, progressive Democrats threaten a leading moderate Democrat in the health care reform fight with losing his chairmanship if he didn’t stop talking to Congressional Republicans, and the Democratic leadership forcing moderate ‘Blue Dog’ Democrats to submit to their rule. That’s always compromising?

But wait, the comment section for the article is even better. Jimfromthefoothills writes, “Remember, we are going to rebuild every school, bridge and road in the country. We will fix healthcare. We will restore the constitution, end illegal wars [and] reduce emissions of greenhouse gasses.” … and then we shall rule the world! Umm, if people like Joe Sudbay say that we shouldn’t listen to uneducated conservative Southern bumpkins then why should we listen to the same kind only on the left? Jim returns later in the comment section to insult Obama, referring to him as ‘Choco-Bush.’ And to think some people believed racism existed only on the right side of the political spectrum.

Jersey asks, “Can we convince Howard Dean to run against Obama in 2012?” Jim returns yet again to add, “Dean\Krugman, Reich\Waters, ANYBODY BUT OBAMA.”

Chairman of the progressive Democracy for America, Jim Dean, chimed in with an e-mail sent to supporters on Monday, August 17th,which told them to “fight any effort to remove a government-run health insurance plan in place of non-profit ‘cooperatives’.” He goes on to suggest that “insider Democrats and the insurance industry are behind the effort to kill a government-run plan.” You mean the same “private insurers and the for-profit health care industry” that donated more to the president and his party “than even Republicans, with the president taking $19 million in the 2008 election cycle alone, more than all his Repubican, Democratic and independent rivals combined?” That same industry?

Have Blue Dog Democrats Sold Out on Health Care?

Wednesday, July 29th, 2009

It never ceases to amaze those in the realm of political discourse how things can change so quickly in so little time. Less than a day after a memo from David L. Cavicke, Republican Chief of Staff for the Committee on Energy and Commerce, was leaked and obtained by Politico in which it was revealed that “Democratic Leadership” had “told Mr. Boehner’s staff that there will be no vote on Health on the Floor before recess and we will leave Friday,” an apparent breakthrough has been made on the Blue Dog Democrat front of the health care reform battle. What this last-minute deal means – a victory for ObamaCare and the Democratic leadership or simple a face-saving rouse – has yet to be seen.

Fox News is reporting that a deal was reached early this morning. The compromise, according to one member of the fiscally conservative Blue Dog Coalition, “would cut the cost of the $1 trillion-plus package by $100 billion” and would “ensure that the proposed government-run insurance program would not be forced on anyone.” In exchange, the floor vote in the House will be put off until after Labor Day when legislators reconvene. Seven Blue Dog Democrats held up passage of the bill within the Committee on Energy and Commerce, the only panel within the House not to pass some form of the president’s health care reform legislation, over growing concerns for the high-cost of the program and the speed at which Democratic leadership was trying to force a vote. Four of those seven Blue Dogs on the committee – Representatives Mike Ross of Arkansas, Baron Hill of Indiana, Zack Space of Ohio, and Bart Gordon of Tennessee – relented and agreed on passage of the bill this morning. This gives Chairman Henry Waxman, representative from California, just enough votes to pass the bill through the committee. It is expected that the committee will meet up this afternoon for mark-up, or finalization, of the bill.

What will happen to President Obama’s health care reform legislation hereafter is anyone’s guess at this point. This is hardly a victory for the White House and the Democratic leadership in Congress, however. There is no physical bill for the president to sign – undoubtedly though he will go out among the masses at his town-hall revivals and proclaim, quite prematurely, “Mission: Accomplished” on ‘meeting’ his August deadline – and there will not be a floor vote on the bill until after Labor Day. At most this ‘deal’ was simply a face-saving maneuver for Obama and Nancy Pelosi going into recess. Still, the choice for the Democrats to take the fight over health care reform in this direction is a double-edged sword for them. Going into recess with nothing would have been hugely embarrassing for the Democrats. Congressional Republicans would have touted this as a victory for their cause and rightfully so. At least with this, they can proclaim that they accomplished something, even if what they eventually did produce lacked any real teeth. No doubt their friends in the mainstream media will gleefully help mask this rouse as a victory for the White House.

But, at the same time, opponents of the president’s legislation have gained a vital opportunity as well. They now have a fixed target date and, quite possibly by the time both houses of Congress break for recess, will have actual legislation to cite. This basically allots them weeks of free-range target practice in which to take pot shots at moderate ‘Blue Dog’ Democrats for not reading the bill. They’ll have plenty of ammo to use. For example, the fact that the $100 billion ‘cut’ from the program is a mere spit in the bucket compared to the overall $900 billion cost.

One has to also take note that while this not be a solid victory for the Democrats, neither is it defeat. The fight is just beginning. Nancy Pelosi still only needs thirteen or fourteen of the fifty-two Blue Dog Democrats to pass the bill on the floor on a razor-thin majority vote.

These Dogs Won’t Roll Over: Blue Dog Dems Issue Demands to Pelosi, Hoyer

Wednesday, July 15th, 2009

Talking Points Memo obtained a letter dated July 9, 2009 sent from the Blue Dog Coalition to the leaders of the Democratic Party in Congress, Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) and House Majority Leader Rep. Stenny Hoyer (D-MD). The letter, signed by 40 moderate Democrats hailing mainly from the South and the West, outlines the changes they demand before signing onto a health care reform bill.

These self-proclaimed “fiscally conservative Democrats” wrote the leader of the House and the leader of their party in Congress to express “strong reservations” about the “process and direction” of the current legislation up for debate surrounding health care reform. The Blue Dog Democrats believe that the legislation lacks deficit neutrality, delivery system reform, small business protection, rural health equity and bipartisanship.

The Coalition also reminded Speaker Pelosi and Leader Hoyer that their group already explained their requirements for a “yes” vote on any health care bill brought to the floor. They also echoed the sentiments of those calling for adequate time for both elected officials and the general public to examine and discuss any proposed legislation, including amendments or changes to the bill. ”Too short of a review period is unacceptable and only undermines Congress’ ability to pass responsible health care reform that works for all Americans,” the letter said.

The group indicated that despite assumed party loyalties, they would not simply vote lockstep with their colleagues on the Left. Without “significant progress” from current tri-committee health care legislation, the Blue Dog Coalition does not feel the reform measures would adequately meet their demands and as a result, they would not stand behind a bill that does not satisfy their requirements. ”We cannot support a final product that fails to do so,” they explained.

Progress stalls on reform as Dems unity craters

Friday, July 10th, 2009

The national news media seem to be more interested in the process this week than in chasing facts on reform and explaining the details.

So far, few outlets have taken on the task of explaining what this means to the consumer - you.

Politico breaks it down very well, and on Fox News, you see reporters brushing over details like co-op plans and a trigger option - until host Bret Baier has to pause to say, “Let’s explain those things.”

NPR’s Mara Liasson and The Weekly Standard’s Steve Hayes offer a concise picture of where the various reform plans are and what to look for.

First Liasson gives her take:

The House, I think, will probably pass something, and it will be a liberal version with a public option in it. The White House has been pretty clear. The president has signaled an openness to this non-profit co-op idea instead of a Medicare-style public option. Rahm Emanuel now has signaled his openness to a trigger, in other words, a public option that would only be enacted if certain circumstances were [met]

Then Hayes does a yoemans’ job of parsing out the track ahead.

foxnewstransk

Meanwhile, Democrats in Congress are falling all over themselves in efforts to change parts of the bills that certain groups find offensive or impractical.

The Washington Post’s JoAnne Allen referred to a “double-barreled setback” on healthcare and climate change.

Politico’s Patrick O’Connor and Chris Frates score the healthcare setback very well, from about every angle conceivable.

From Blue Dog Democrat’s concerns about the direction of the current bill - and that representatives actually have time to read it before a vote - to rural and western Dems’ insistance that inequities in health care reimbursements get fixed, the left appears to be fracturing and momentum on healthcare reform stalling.