Author Archive

Tommy Thompson: The DNC Misrepresented Me

Friday, October 16th, 2009

Earlier this month, Tommy Thompson, former governor of Wisconsin and the Health and Human Services (HHS) secretary under President George W. Bush, along with former Democratic House Majority Leader Richard A. Gephardt, urged Congress to overcome their differences and get the job done on health care reform. And while Thompson admitted there still remained many “troublesome and unresolved” issues in the Baucuscare bill, the Democratic National Committee (DNC) wasted no time in exploiting this as the latest example in ‘bi-partisan support’ for the president’s health care reform legislation. An advertisement produced by the DNC asserts that Thompson along with fellow prominent Republicans like Senator Bob Dole, California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, Senator Susan Collins, and former Senator Bill Frist support the same health insurance reform proposal they do.

However, Tommy Thompson, appearing on Your World with Neil Cavuto on Fox News this afternoon, insists that what the DNC advertisement is perpetuating is simply not true. He argues that what he and fellow Republicans featured in the commercial signed onto was the notion that Republicans should work for reform, not, as Rahm Emanuel would care to suggest otherwise, that they should pass the reform plan created by the White House and the Congressional Democratic leadership. The advertisement, which has since been pulled from the airwaves, used Thompson’s image without his permission in order to attack Republicans. This was never his intention, the former Wisconsin governor said; his purpose was to bring the two sides together on the issue of health care reform for all Americans. He insists there is eighty percent of this current health care bill that both parties can support and that is what Democrats and Republicans in Congress should be focusing their efforts toward.

Robert Reich: What An Honest President Would Say About Health Reform

Thursday, October 15th, 2009

A little over two years ago, Robert Reich, former Labor Secretary under President Bill Clinton and currently an economic advisor to President Obama, spoke at the University of California, Berkeley. The content of what he said that evening has just now come to light. This is relevant not only because the content of his speech, or at least a portion of it, concerned health care reform, but that he let slip what the White House and the Congressional Democratic leadership truly have in store when it comes to this vital issue – none of it good.

Speaking at a Colloquium on Political Science at the California collegial institution on September 26th, 2007, Robert Reich spent time on a number of prominent topics, including, if you care to listen to the entire audio of the speech he gave that evening, global warming. But what concerns us most at the present time is what he had to say in regards to how healthcare reform should be presented by a candidate – presumably a progressive one – for president if, according to him, we as Americans truly lived in an educated, honorable, realistic democracy. Thank goodness we live in a constitutional republic, huh?

Reich spelled out for those in attendance what an honest president – so, in other words, neither his former boss nor his current one – should say to the American people about health care reform. Every single point he makes in the video above is in essence word-for-word the arguments conservatives have made for months in the course of this health care debate against the plans proposed by Congressional Democrats, including Senator Max Baucus’s joke of a bill, America’s Healthy Future Act of 2009.

Such gems include:

  • Young, healthy people having to pay more for health care
  • Keeping the latest medical technology and pharmaceutical drugs out of the hands of seniors because extending their lives a few more years is “too expensive”
  • And because seniors are ‘too expensive’ to maintain, the government is ‘just going to let them die’.
  • The government, using the leverage of Medicare and Medicaid programs, would force pharmaceutical companies to keep the costs of prescription drugs low. This, in turn, would mean ‘less innovation’ and ‘less new products’.
  • All this adds up to the conclusion that you will not likely live longer then your parents.

And, no, ladies and gentlemen, he isn’t joking.

It is very difficult to decide what is more astonishing – that someone like Robert Reich would go in front of an audience and openly say something like this or that the crowd actually applauds the fact that they will ‘not live longer’ then their parents. More then likely the room was packed full of white privileged elitists who are rich enough not to have to be subjected to the same medical care as the lowly mortals below them.

More Socialized Medicine Horror Stories

Monday, October 12th, 2009

Just a little over a week ago, Healthcare Horserace brought to you the extraordinary stories of two Canadian women, Cheryl Baxter and Lindsay McCreith, both of whom had serious health afflictions – one with brain cancer, the other with a bad hip that left her in excruciating pain – and were refused proper attention from their country’s socialized medical program. Ultimately, both of these women had to spend thousands of their hard earned money to travel to America in order to receive the treatments necessary to survive. Now we report to you two brand new socialized medical horror stories, this time from across the pond, in the United Kingdom.

The first story is about an eighty-year-old East Sussex woman named Hazel Fenton who, nine months ago, was admitted to Conquest hospital with a case of pneumonia. Shortly thereafter, however, medical officials made the decision to take her off her antibiotics and deny her artificial feeding, choosing, essentially, to starve the woman to death, believing her to have only days left to live. The old woman was placed on the controversial Liverpool Care Pathway (LCP) plan, which, according to health officials, is suppose to ease the last days of dying patients. And while the program is intended strictly for terminally ill patients who only have days left to live, Times Online reports that “it is being used more widely in the NHS, denying treatment to elderly patients who are not dying,” like Hazel Fenton.

Hazel’s daughter, forty-two year old Christine Ball, “had to fight hospital staff for weeks before her mother was taken off the plan and given artificial feeding.” Thankfully, she was successful in her effort. Christine Bell’s perception of the LCP and the National Health Service in the United Kingdom, however, is forever tainted. She views the LCP as nothing more then a “subterfuge for legalised [sic] euthanasia of the elderly on the NHS.” And she is not the only one who views the situation as such. Peter Hargreaves, a consultant in palliative medicine, fears that “as they are spreading out across the country, the training is getting probably more and more diluted,” resulting in many individuals who might be able to recover being left to die.

The other tragic story concerns thirty-one year old Matthew Millington, who, after joining the army at the age of sixteen, rose to the rank of corporal in the Queen’s Royal Lancers. In December 2005, he was diagnosed with a lung illness that required a double-lung transplant in order to survive. He died in his home in Brown Lees ten months after receiving that life saving surgery after it was discovered that the organs implanted in him were “from a donor who is believed to have smoked between 30 and 50 roll-up cigarettes a day,” according to The Telegraph.

An investigation conducted at Papworth Hospital, in Cambridge, following his death found several unnerving problems, among them issues of communication, record-keeping and patient handover. It was discovered that a radiographer had failed to highlight the growth of a cancerous tumor. The lack of communication between the radiographer and the consultants allowed the tumor to grow unnoticed for two whole months. What is worse is that the immunosuppressive drugs doctors had Mr. Millington on to prevent his body from rejecting the organs helped accelerate the growth of the tumor in his new lungs.

Of course, there is no information in the article to indicate the radiographer was, or ever will be, disciplined. The authors of this article do not even bother to ask why there is no investigation into why the lungs of a man who was clearly an aggressive smoker were accepted as suitable organs in the first place.

Rep. Grayson Tells GOP ‘Get Out of the Way’ on Health Care

Friday, October 9th, 2009

Once again, here is everyone’s favorite freshman Florida representative, Alan Grayson, Democrat from the 8th Congressional District, back to milk every last second of his fifteen minutes in the political spotlight for all it is worth. Notice how the man never once loses eye contact with the camera.

Politico has the video over at their website. There is no embedding, so just click the video below to go over to their site and watch the video:

gray-out

So what is he riling against this time? Is he claiming that a former Republican governor in his state likes to eat live puppies? Not exactly, but he did take aim at Republican legislators, specifically Maine Senator Olympia Snowe, telling them, in the area of health care, to “just get out of the way.” Yep, the ol’ spirit of bi-partisan cooperation and understanding, just like President Obama said he’d usher into Congress during his presidency. Rep. Grayson added, “You can lead, you can follow or you can get out of the way, and I’m telling you to get out of the way.”

Of course, as he has done twice in the past, Representative Alan Grayson did his little soapbox rant after business hours, once every Republican legislator had gone home for the evening. The man is absolutely spineless. The man has the gaul to mock Joe Wilson who stood up and said right to the President of the United States that he was a liar. Meanwhile this guy insists he is the only truth-teller in both houses of Congress, yet chooses to make such speeches to a chamber full of empty chairs.

Bozell: Reid Scheming to Ram ObamaCare Through Congress

Thursday, October 8th, 2009

In a conference call late Thursday afternoon, Brent Bozell, founder of the Media Research Center, reiterated what he said on Fox and Friends earlier in the day that Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid appears poised to sneak President Obama’s public-option health care reform proposal into an unrelated bill. Rather then hold a bi-partisan discussion in both the House and the Senate, Bozell says, “You’re going to get Harry Reid’s bill, passed by the Senate, by the Democrats… immediately rubber-stamping it, no debate, no House-Senate conference, no Republican discussion, and it goes right to the president for his signature, and oh, by the way, no one knows what’s in it.” Talk about a nuclear option.

A senior aide to the Nevada Democratic senator told CNSNews.com, a news site operated by MRC, that it is ‘likely’ the Senate Majority Leader will use House Resolution 1586 as a ‘shell’ for enacting the final version of the Senate’s health care legislation. H.R. 1586 was a bill passed this past March in the House that sought to impose a ninety percent tax on bonuses paid to employees of certain bailed-out financial institutions, specifically AIG. Were Senator Reid to do this, the substance of H.R. 1586 would be removed and replaced with whatever the White House and Congressional Democratic leaders ultimately decide will encompass their health care package. A scam such as this would require the support of sixty senators to vote for cloture on the motion to proceed to H.R. 1586, thus ending debate on the congressional procedure and moving the bill forward. If Reid successfully obtains the sixty votes needed, then debate begins on the health care package. However, Reid could choose to block all amendments and attempt to get a vote on the entire package.

Should the House vote on the bill as passed by the Senate without amending it, it could then be sent directly to President Obama’s desk for his signature (behind closed doors, no doubt, as was the case with the stimulus package) without the need for those pesky checks and balances. Here’s where it gets real scary: the actual text of the legislation will be determined by Reid himself, who at his own leisure can draft and insert textual language that was never approved by either the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee or the Senate Finance Committee.

This all seems a little much to wrap your brain around, right? Why would Senator Harry Reid, who trails in the polls in his own state behind Republican opponents, choose to do this? What politician in their right mind would sign on for this? Democratic candidates across the board are getting clobbered by their Republican opponents, so would this not make a catastrophic situation even worse? There is certainly enough corruption and lack of distain for the American populous to believe that the Democratic majority are capable of such a swindle, but why now? Does Harry Reid, with all his bent up ego, see himself as the modern day General Custer and this is his last stand? That if he is going to go down, he’s going to take every one else with him? From a political scientist stand point, this scenario does not make sense and, if it does come to pass, would only reek of desperation in the eyes of the American people, further damaging what little support the Democrats in Congress find themselves standing with now.

School Kids Sing Praises of Health Care Reform on CNN

Wednesday, October 7th, 2009

Remember not so long ago those creepy online videos that popped up on YouTube showing grade school children singing a song praising President Obama as if they were in Communist China in the midst of the Cultural Revolution hailing Mao Zedong himself? Well, prepare yourself because those were nothing compared to a bunch of musically trained fifty graders pitching in (and selling out) to help the White House and the Congressional Democratic leadership to “take us to school on health care.”

If only all the children were as smart a tack as little Willie is. The song, sung by children from the Ron Clark Academy in Atlanta, is set to Miley Cyrus’s new song, Party in the USA.

If you didn’t notice while watching the video, here is a just sampling of the lyrics:

“Obama says everyone needs health coverage in America now.
We need to insure those 47 million but the government doesn’t know how.
I got my bill and think, no way.
And, what about my brother?
He’s hurting and can’t get covered”

Umm, who is not creped out by this? And then the Democrats wonder why conservatives think that Obama is pulling America toward socialism? Oh, if you think you recognize these kids from somewhere else, you might be thinking back to right before the November 2008 presidential election when these same kids came out and sang a song called “Vote However You Like.” Hmm, quite a fall from where they were before, huh?

Baucuscare Bill Vote Delayed for Cost Report

Tuesday, October 6th, 2009

What could very well result in a resounding death knell for public-option health care reform legislation at a time when the White House and the Congressional Democratic leadership have grown increasingly desperate in their efforts to push it forward, a key vote in the Senate Finance Committee has been pushed back to later this week, and perhaps into next week as well. Crucial fence riders, including Maine Republican Olympia Snowe and West Virginia Democrat Jay Rockefeller, await an estimate on how much Senator Max Baucus’s overhaul of the American health care system would cost before committing themselves either way for the bill.

The Obama administration and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nevada) have put relentless pressure on the Chairman of the Senate Committee on Finance to schedule a vote on his health care reform bill, America’s Healthy Future Act of 2009, prior to the release of the program’s estimated cost by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), to no avail. The reason behind this may be that the president knows that it is very likely the CBO’s findings will come out against him as so many, if not all, of their studies related to the health care issue this past summer have exactly that.

And while former Health and Human Services secretary under President George W. Bush and former governor of Wisconsin, Tommy Thompson, and former Democratic House Majority Leader Richard Gephardt have both urged Congress to overcome their differences and get the job done on health care reform, their rallying cry hasn’t exactly inspired confidence in the hearts of wavering senators. Thompson and Gephardt admitted that there still remained many “troublesome and unresolved” issues in the Baucuscare bill. What is more is that former Tennessee senator Bill Frist, who to TIME magazine expressed support for health care reform, recanted, saying that the proposal is “not where I want it to be. It’s going to cost way too much, and we’re not going to get all the uninsured into the marketplace.”

Even if the CBO report comes out against the Baucus bill and it fails to pass the Finance Committee with a majority vote, there still remains Senator Reid’s ‘nuclear’ option that he has threatened Republicans and Blue Dog Democrats with in the past should they fail to reach an agreement. And yet there is even doubt there would be enough Democratic support for that. Falling approval numbers for President Obama and the rise in the number of dissatisfied independent voters has many senators, if some who have been in office for quite some time, concerned about their job security. The ‘nuclear’ option, if passed, would likely be the president calling on Democratic senators to commit seppuku for the sake of progressivism; a call very few would care to endure.

Medicare’s Denial Rate Nearly Double That of Private Carriers

Tuesday, October 6th, 2009

Here is a little bit of news that the mainstream media is unlikely to pick up on, especially on the same day the White House welcomed doctors from across the United States to the White House to share their unique perspective on the struggles that American families face every day when it comes to health care.” The fact that the one hundred and fifty invite-only attendees belonged to Doctors for America, formerly Doctors for Obama, is beside the point and best left unmentioned.

In any event, Beverly Gossage, a Research Fellow for the Show-Me Institute based out of Missouri and founder of HSA Benefits Consulting, did some independent research to determine which health care insurance provider had the largest denial rate. What she ultimately found was truly shocking.

Her answer came on the fifth page of the sixteen-page document called the 2008 National Health Insurer Report Card published by the American Medical Association (AMA). Found on the page was a chart (featured below) that contrasted the percentage of denied claims of Medicare with those of private insurers, such as Aetna, Anthem, CIGNA, Coventry, and Humana, among others. 

denialsbyinsurer2008

Would you believe the denial rate for Medicare was nearly double that of the average percentage of denied claims for all the private insurance companies combined? Yep, out of the 6,938,431 claims Medicare received between March 1st, 2007 and March 10th, 2008, 475, 566 of them, or 6.85% of requests, were rejected. Compare this to UHC, which had the largest number of requests (1,127,691) out of the seven private health insurance companies, who had a denial rate of 2.68% within that same time frame.

What makes a little bit more unsettling is that AMA, who produced this report showing Medicare’s denial rate far above any private insurer, endorsed President Obama’s public-option monstrosity. With these facts in mind, do we really want our medical decisions, many of them likely to determine whether we live or die, in the hands of politicians and big government?

Sen. Harry Reid Lectures GOP on Patriotism

Tuesday, October 6th, 2009

If you cannot grasp the tremendous sense of irony this article’s title has then you clearly are not paying close enough attention. Democrat Harry Reid, the increasingly desperate Senate Majority Leader from the state of Nevada, lectured Senate Republicans on the floor this afternoon, believing them to be “so blinded by their desire to defeat President Obama they cheered the Chicago’s loss of the Olympics.” Hmm, anyone want to take a case who not-too-long-ago said directly that the war in Iraq was lost? Just take a wild guess.

Politico’s Glenn Thrush has video of Senator Reid’s entire speech as well as a brief transcript of some of the highlights:

“This is the same minority that happily pumped one fist when America lost its bid to host Olympics, but shakes the other fist at those it slanders as unpatriotic.

This is the same minority that disputes indisputable evidence about how our health care plan will help seniors, or disputes indisputable evidence about our President’s birth records.”

This is the same minority that relies on distortions, distractions and deception to change the subject away from health care, rather than debate the facts in good faith”

Would any one else care to point out to Mr. Reid that a measly forty-seven percent of Chicagoans, you know, the same eight-five percent of whom voted for Barack Obama in the last presidential election, supported the Olympics coming to their city in 2016?

Whatever happened to dissent is patriotic? Were these not the same people, Senator Reid among them leading the charge, who spewed this line when George W. Bush was in office? Now, all of sudden, its unpatriotic to not support the president? And does invoking Obama’s failed Olympic bid support his point about conservative opposition to health care reform at all? Not really; in fact, it does more damage then good. Senator Harry Reid, like his fellow Congressional Democratic leadership colleagues, is desperate to garner Republican support, no matter how piddling (*cough*Olympia Snowe*cough*), so he can exclaim, “Look! I got us bi-partisan support!” He knows time is running out quickly as public support for the president’s health care proposal steadily decreases with each new poll released.

Rep. Tom Price: The ‘Tide is Turning’ in Health Care Debate

Monday, October 5th, 2009

Dr. Tom Price, representative for the 6th Congressional District of Georgia, said candidly in a late-afternoon conference call on Thursday, October 1st, that from where he sits, in the ‘cross-hairs’ of the health care debate, the ‘tide is turning’ because ‘people are waking up’ to the grim reality we as Americans face under a government-run health care system.

The chairman of the Republican Study Committee (RSC), a group of over one hundred and ten House Republicans organized for the purpose of advancing a conservative social and economic agenda in the House of Representatives, argued that it is not just the public-option proposal that stands to destroy the quality of health care in America, though it certainly remains the biggest topic of concern for conservative legislators. Two other specific areas of concern include the pay-or-play employer mandate as well as the idea, included in every single plan proposed by the Democrats, that decisions have to made by Washington and not between a patient and his doctor. Every single one of these proposals has the potential to do great harm to this country’s health care system.

Representative Price insisted that any health care reform legislators, Republican or Democrat, propose must be based on six principles – accessibility, affordability, quality, responsiveness, innovation, and choices.

The Georgia representative went on to say that Democrats are lying when they claim Republicans and conservatives are against any kind of health care reform and that they have not produced a single alternative solution to their proposals. He agrees with Congressional Democrats that our health care system is not perfect and that it contains serious problems that need to be addressed, although they are far different from anything they have in mind. Among the things we need to solve in health care system, Price says, includes fixing insurance problems, specifically the areas of portability and patients with pre-existing injuries who can’t get coverage, as well as the lawsuit abuse issue and the establishment of the patient/doctor relationship into law.

And, contrary to the claims made by the Democrats that House Republicans have offered up nothing in return for their proposals, the RSC to date has written up thirty-five health care-related laws or bills, including HR 3400, the Empowering Patients First Act. The bill addresses four main principles – access to coverage for all Americans, coverage truly owned by the patient, improvement of the health care delivery structure, and the reining in of out of control costs.

HR 3400 makes the purchase of health care financially feasible for all Americans, covers pre-existing conditions, protects employer-sponsored insurance, and shines light on existing health care plans. The legislation also grants a far greater choice and portability to the patient, gives employers more flexibility in the benefits they offer their employees, and expands the individual market through the creation of several pooling mechanism. The delivery structure is advanced thanks to the establishment of doctor-led quality measures and the reimbursement of physicians. And finally, the cost of the plan is offset through decreasing defensive medicine, savings from health care efficiencies, sifting out waste, fraud and abuse, plus an annual one-percent non defense discretionary spending step down.

Whatever politicians ultimately decide to move forward with in terms of reforming the nation’s health care system, Price firmly believes that we as American citizens have to ensure that that plan safeguards our ability to make our own medical decisions, not politicians on the Washington Beltway to make them for us. Entrenching the patient/doctor relationship, he believes, is the pulse of the health care issue.